Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Design Philosophy of 5e
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 6321333" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>Earthquakes are catastrophic. Typhoons, tornadoes, and electing Justin Beiber to high office would be catastrophic.</p><p></p><p>A game design choice? Um, no. Hyperbolic language isn't your friend.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Two problems with that statement. </p><p></p><p>First and foremost - one game does not "invalidate" another. Football does not "invalidate" soccer. You may not be able to play both games on the same field at the same time, but that doesn't mean one or the other is invalid.</p><p></p><p>Second: The word of the day is "compromise". The only thing preventing reconciliation is the player's hyper-picky, stubborn nature. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You do realize that this is not a new situation, right? Pathfinder has been supporting the 3e ruleset for some years now. So, groups already have to decide if they want 3e-ish or 4e-ish play. The world has not suffered catastrophe for having to have that discussion at tables.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Probably the same way they could have done for the past few years, while they had the Pathfinder Society and Living Forgotten Realms supporting 3e/Pathfinder and 4e, respectively.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Friction? Because I can't have someone at a nearby table playing a different game from me? Really? </p><p></p><p>I usually avoid sarcasm, but I do you know how silly that sounds?</p><p></p><p>Joe: "Tom, I've been your friend for years, but it really chaps my dingoes that you're playing a different game under the same roof as I am!"</p><p>Tom: "Yes, Joe, I know what you mean. Your game invalidates mine! Our game differences cannot be reconciled. So, I will have to slap you around with a limp trout! <em>*thwapslap!*</em>"</p><p>Joe: "Fine, then! I have a whiffle bat here! <em>*boonk!*</em>"</p><p>Both: <em>*thwapslap!* *boonk!* *thwapslap!* *boonk!*</em></p><p></p><p>If you can't compromise about how you want to pretend to be elves, you look more foolish than people pretending to be elves!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Tables have had to have that discussion since the very first house-rule was written, since the second RPG ever hit the market. We have been doing this for decades already, and the world has not stopped turning.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 6321333, member: 177"] Earthquakes are catastrophic. Typhoons, tornadoes, and electing Justin Beiber to high office would be catastrophic. A game design choice? Um, no. Hyperbolic language isn't your friend. Two problems with that statement. First and foremost - one game does not "invalidate" another. Football does not "invalidate" soccer. You may not be able to play both games on the same field at the same time, but that doesn't mean one or the other is invalid. Second: The word of the day is "compromise". The only thing preventing reconciliation is the player's hyper-picky, stubborn nature. You do realize that this is not a new situation, right? Pathfinder has been supporting the 3e ruleset for some years now. So, groups already have to decide if they want 3e-ish or 4e-ish play. The world has not suffered catastrophe for having to have that discussion at tables. Probably the same way they could have done for the past few years, while they had the Pathfinder Society and Living Forgotten Realms supporting 3e/Pathfinder and 4e, respectively. Friction? Because I can't have someone at a nearby table playing a different game from me? Really? I usually avoid sarcasm, but I do you know how silly that sounds? Joe: "Tom, I've been your friend for years, but it really chaps my dingoes that you're playing a different game under the same roof as I am!" Tom: "Yes, Joe, I know what you mean. Your game invalidates mine! Our game differences cannot be reconciled. So, I will have to slap you around with a limp trout! [I]*thwapslap!*[/I]" Joe: "Fine, then! I have a whiffle bat here! [I]*boonk!*[/I]" Both: [I]*thwapslap!* *boonk!* *thwapslap!* *boonk!*[/I] If you can't compromise about how you want to pretend to be elves, you look more foolish than people pretending to be elves! Tables have had to have that discussion since the very first house-rule was written, since the second RPG ever hit the market. We have been doing this for decades already, and the world has not stopped turning. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Design Philosophy of 5e
Top