Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Design Philosophy of 5e
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Hitcher" data-source="post: 6321789" data-attributes="member: 63747"><p>Haven't had time to read the entire thread, but I just wanted to thank Thaumaturge for bringing this up. I agree that many of the naysayers who are getting worked up over each individual rule aren't seeing the forest for the trees. I love the direction his edition is going in encouraging DM and player responsibility, and I hope it ultimately does lead to more "rulings over rules" and thus less people being obsessed with min-maxing and exploiting the rules.</p><p></p><p>Something I've been thinking about lately: competitive games (like tactical miniatures games) really benefit from tight rules that help keep everything as unambiguous and fair as possible, but co-operative RPGs benefit much more from flexible rules that are able to allow for the infinite possible situations and desires of the players. D&D has always had an uneasy foot in each camp, but definitely tipped more towards the "tight" in the last two editions. I think shifting its weight back in the other direction is a fantastic move that will suit the concept of the game much better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Hitcher, post: 6321789, member: 63747"] Haven't had time to read the entire thread, but I just wanted to thank Thaumaturge for bringing this up. I agree that many of the naysayers who are getting worked up over each individual rule aren't seeing the forest for the trees. I love the direction his edition is going in encouraging DM and player responsibility, and I hope it ultimately does lead to more "rulings over rules" and thus less people being obsessed with min-maxing and exploiting the rules. Something I've been thinking about lately: competitive games (like tactical miniatures games) really benefit from tight rules that help keep everything as unambiguous and fair as possible, but co-operative RPGs benefit much more from flexible rules that are able to allow for the infinite possible situations and desires of the players. D&D has always had an uneasy foot in each camp, but definitely tipped more towards the "tight" in the last two editions. I think shifting its weight back in the other direction is a fantastic move that will suit the concept of the game much better. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Design Philosophy of 5e
Top