Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="howandwhy99" data-source="post: 3732310" data-attributes="member: 3192">This is one of the things on messageboards that just boggles my mind.&nbsp; Designers cannot lock Bards in the closet.&nbsp; They cannot kill all the Gnomes.&nbsp; They cannot transform Paladins into a Prestige Class for high level characters only.&nbsp; Nor can they put Tieflings in the game.&nbsp; Or two-headed flails.&nbsp; Or two-headed whips!They are not publishing 4E as a setting.&nbsp; These are rules, and presumably, you and your DM will be able to use the rules to create whatever setting elements you wish and remove the ones you don't.&nbsp; How scared of creating rules have we become?If they cut gnomes from the PHB4-1, we will see a hundred different iterations on the internet within the first month.Remember 3.0 Rangers?&nbsp; And that was simply distaste for the rules actually included.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="howandwhy99, post: 3732310, member: 3192"] This is one of the things on messageboards that just boggles my mind. Designers cannot lock Bards in the closet. They cannot kill all the Gnomes. They cannot transform Paladins into a Prestige Class for high level characters only. Nor can they put Tieflings in the game. Or two-headed flails. Or two-headed whips! They are not publishing 4E as a setting. These are rules, and presumably, you and your DM will be able to use the rules to create whatever setting elements you wish and remove the ones you don't. [b]How scared of creating rules have we become?[/b] If they cut gnomes from the PHB4-1, we will see a hundred different iterations on the internet within the first month. Remember 3.0 Rangers? And that was simply distaste for the rules actually included. [/QUOTE]

Verification