Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Designing a good PF class is hard
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pawsplay" data-source="post: 4908757" data-attributes="member: 15538"><p>Designing a good PF class is relatively more difficult than designing a base class for straight up 3.5. The first difficulty is that Hit Die and BAB are generally tied together; while logical, and rarely much of an issue in 3.5, these were areas where last ditch adjustments could be made, such as the ranger and scout's anomolously low and high HD, respectively. A second problem is that the goal of filling every level with an ability not only requires that classes be given plenty of stuff, but also restricts the kinds of ability that can be handed out on a repeating basis. In 3.5, if an ability was about twice as potent as sneak attack, for instance, you could have it advance half as quickly, but in PF, this would leave dead levels. </p><p></p><p>Taken together, it is very difficult to do an Unearthed Arcana cut-and-paste class design. For instance, transplanting fighter feats onto a rogue would require some fiddling with the progression, while an ability that advances every five levels cannot be swapped for one that advances every three. It is not sufficient for the total to be roughly equal, but the abilities must also be lain out level by level.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pawsplay, post: 4908757, member: 15538"] Designing a good PF class is relatively more difficult than designing a base class for straight up 3.5. The first difficulty is that Hit Die and BAB are generally tied together; while logical, and rarely much of an issue in 3.5, these were areas where last ditch adjustments could be made, such as the ranger and scout's anomolously low and high HD, respectively. A second problem is that the goal of filling every level with an ability not only requires that classes be given plenty of stuff, but also restricts the kinds of ability that can be handed out on a repeating basis. In 3.5, if an ability was about twice as potent as sneak attack, for instance, you could have it advance half as quickly, but in PF, this would leave dead levels. Taken together, it is very difficult to do an Unearthed Arcana cut-and-paste class design. For instance, transplanting fighter feats onto a rogue would require some fiddling with the progression, while an ability that advances every five levels cannot be swapped for one that advances every three. It is not sufficient for the total to be roughly equal, but the abilities must also be lain out level by level. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Designing a good PF class is hard
Top