Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Designing a skill system that the PLAYER can opt into.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rune" data-source="post: 6122164" data-attributes="member: 67"><p>So, the latest L&L tells us that feats are being designed so that players can choose whether they want to use them or not, but the inclusion of <em>skills</em> will have to be the DM's decision, because the DCs will have to be higher.</p><p></p><p>This need not be so. If a skill provides a baseline <em>minimum</em> proficiency, rather than expanding upon the maximum, the DCs won't be effected at all.</p><p></p><p><strong>The "Skilled" Option:</strong></p><p></p><p>It could be pretty simple, actually. Instead of the normal ability check at <strong>1d20 + ability modifier</strong>, a trained skill would allow the player to make the check at <strong>1d10 + 10 + ability modifier</strong>. A character's highest degree of success is still bound by natural talent, but the chance of failure is greatly reduced.</p><p></p><p><strong>The "Skill-Levels" Option:</strong></p><p></p><p>If you want to be able to increase skill as the character levels, you could change the die type (and corresponding bonus) at different points. The lowest level of the skill would provide <strong>1d12 + 8 + ability modifier</strong>. The next level would provide <strong>1d10 + 10 + ability modifier</strong>. Then, <strong>1d8 + 12 + ability modifier</strong>. Followed by <strong>1d6 + 14 + ability modifier</strong>. And, finally, the highest level of mastery: <strong>1d4 + 16 + ability modifier</strong>. (The really nice thing about this approach is that, at the master level, you'd really only need to roll for the hardest tasks; most others would automatically succeed.)</p><p></p><p>These tiers could easily be given titles, such as these provided by [MENTION=61749]Jeff Carlsen[/MENTION]: Apprentice, Journeyman, Professional, Expert, and Master.</p><p></p><p>So, how to balance the character that has, say, 4 of these skills with one who doesn't? I'm sure there are plenty of ways. Personally, I'd like to see something that more or less takes the place of the skills--that is, a simplified means of making task accomplishment easier.</p><p></p><p><strong>The "Non-Skilled" Option:</strong></p><p></p><p>This is how <em>I'd</em> do it: For every trained skill that the character <em>would</em> be entitled to, but chooses not to, I'd give them one use of a <strong>"Succeed when you need to"</strong> ability (that, when expended, would grant automatic success to an ability check or contest). Each use, once expended, would only recharge <em>after the character has gained a new level</em>.</p><p></p><p>Of course, this leaves one issue. Over the course of this thread, it has become clear that some folk actually like rolling high results with their skilled characters to show off how specialized they are. For them, capping all ability checks (even skilled ones) at the same maximum (that is, 20 + ability modifier) is simply not satisfying.</p><p></p><p><strong>The "Exceed the Cap" Option:</strong></p><p></p><p>A simple solution to that problem would be to add the following option to exceed the cap: <strong>If you roll the maximum value for your ability check, something crazy good happens (or the die explodes, if your player really likes rolling dice!)</strong>.</p><p></p><p>As this option would also apply to characters opting out of the skill system, it would still be balanced with such a character who has the <strong>"Succeed when you need to"</strong> ability (or something similar). Also, it would mean that more skilled characters would tend to exceed that gap more frequently than less (or non-) skilled characters, as the dice used would be smaller.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rune, post: 6122164, member: 67"] So, the latest L&L tells us that feats are being designed so that players can choose whether they want to use them or not, but the inclusion of [i]skills[/i] will have to be the DM's decision, because the DCs will have to be higher. This need not be so. If a skill provides a baseline [i]minimum[/i] proficiency, rather than expanding upon the maximum, the DCs won't be effected at all. [b]The "Skilled" Option:[/b] It could be pretty simple, actually. Instead of the normal ability check at [b]1d20 + ability modifier[/b], a trained skill would allow the player to make the check at [b]1d10 + 10 + ability modifier[/b]. A character's highest degree of success is still bound by natural talent, but the chance of failure is greatly reduced. [b]The "Skill-Levels" Option:[/b] If you want to be able to increase skill as the character levels, you could change the die type (and corresponding bonus) at different points. The lowest level of the skill would provide [b]1d12 + 8 + ability modifier[/b]. The next level would provide [b]1d10 + 10 + ability modifier[/b]. Then, [b]1d8 + 12 + ability modifier[/b]. Followed by [b]1d6 + 14 + ability modifier[/b]. And, finally, the highest level of mastery: [b]1d4 + 16 + ability modifier[/b]. (The really nice thing about this approach is that, at the master level, you'd really only need to roll for the hardest tasks; most others would automatically succeed.) These tiers could easily be given titles, such as these provided by [MENTION=61749]Jeff Carlsen[/MENTION]: Apprentice, Journeyman, Professional, Expert, and Master. So, how to balance the character that has, say, 4 of these skills with one who doesn't? I'm sure there are plenty of ways. Personally, I'd like to see something that more or less takes the place of the skills--that is, a simplified means of making task accomplishment easier. [b]The "Non-Skilled" Option:[/b] This is how [i]I'd[/i] do it: For every trained skill that the character [i]would[/i] be entitled to, but chooses not to, I'd give them one use of a [b]"Succeed when you need to"[/b] ability (that, when expended, would grant automatic success to an ability check or contest). Each use, once expended, would only recharge [i]after the character has gained a new level[/i]. Of course, this leaves one issue. Over the course of this thread, it has become clear that some folk actually like rolling high results with their skilled characters to show off how specialized they are. For them, capping all ability checks (even skilled ones) at the same maximum (that is, 20 + ability modifier) is simply not satisfying. [b]The "Exceed the Cap" Option:[/b] A simple solution to that problem would be to add the following option to exceed the cap: [b]If you roll the maximum value for your ability check, something crazy good happens (or the die explodes, if your player really likes rolling dice!)[/b]. As this option would also apply to characters opting out of the skill system, it would still be balanced with such a character who has the [b]"Succeed when you need to"[/b] ability (or something similar). Also, it would mean that more skilled characters would tend to exceed that gap more frequently than less (or non-) skilled characters, as the dice used would be smaller. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Designing a skill system that the PLAYER can opt into.
Top