Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 7304768" data-attributes="member: 6779196">This is just a feature of the Class design though. Getting Fighter AC on a Barbarian is possible even with Array or Point Buy stats, it just takes longer to get there. And comes at the opportunity cost of using all your ASIs on Con and Dex instead of Feats and/or other abilities. But still, Barbarians being able to compete with Fighters in the AC department while lightly armored is a feature, not a bug, and if the Fighter has equally high Ability Scores, he’ll outshine the Barbarian in other ways, such as having way more Feats.If everyone has super high ability scores, the classes should be just as balanced against each other as they are when everyone has average ability scores. The ability scores seem in the OP’s game just set a higher baseline for everyone, there’s something else going on that’s allowing the other players to break the bounds of that baseline. Most likely magic items and/or rules being interpreted strangely.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 7304768, member: 6779196"] This is just a feature of the Class design though. Getting Fighter AC on a Barbarian is possible even with Array or Point Buy stats, it just takes longer to get there. And comes at the opportunity cost of using all your ASIs on Con and Dex instead of Feats and/or other abilities. But still, Barbarians being able to compete with Fighters in the AC department while lightly armored is a feature, not a bug, and if the Fighter has equally high Ability Scores, he’ll outshine the Barbarian in other ways, such as having way more Feats. If everyone has super high ability scores, the classes should be just as balanced against each other as they are when everyone has average ability scores. The ability scores seem in the OP’s game just set a higher baseline for everyone, there’s something else going on that’s allowing the other players to break the bounds of that baseline. Most likely magic items and/or rules being interpreted strangely. [/QUOTE]

Verification