Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="irdeggman" data-source="post: 3968127" data-attributes="member: 16285">So if the chracter had a ring of protection +1 and a +2 longsword as well as the hat of disguise - this logic would have the single casting of misdirection working to cover all of the auras - even though they are &quot;different&quot; auras.Ring of protection - abjurationLong sword - evocationHat of disguise - faint illusionThe text for the misdirection spell states &quot;On casting the spell you choose another object within range. For the duration of the spell, the subject of misdirection is directed as if it were the other object.&quot;But it does also so that you can detect as &quot;not magical&quot;.I think that the target must be a single object or creature though.&nbsp; My logic has to do with what would be detected in the above example if the character was &quot;invisible&quot; instead of &quot;disguised&quot;.Not all spells affect all objects held by the target. Invisibility says it does, so does diguise self, misdirection does not.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="irdeggman, post: 3968127, member: 16285"] So if the chracter had a ring of protection +1 and a +2 longsword as well as the hat of disguise - this logic would have the single casting of misdirection working to cover all of the auras - even though they are "different" auras. Ring of protection - abjuration Long sword - evocation Hat of disguise - faint illusion The text for the misdirection spell states "On casting the spell you choose another object within range. For the duration of the spell, the subject of misdirection is directed as if it were the other object." But it does also so that you can detect as "not magical". I think that the target must be a single object or creature though. My logic has to do with what would be detected in the above example if the character was "invisible" instead of "disguised". Not all spells affect all objects held by the target. Invisibility says it does, so does diguise self, misdirection does not. [/QUOTE]

Verification