Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Detect Thoughts spell doubt: can I concentrate on the target without going deeper into its mind?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 7552003" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>If you are a DM who actually gives different "surface thoughts" each round, then sure, I can understand your POV.</p><p></p><p>For me though, as I said above... I don't run surface thoughts that way. Surface thoughts do not change round to round. They have an overriding attitude and that's what gets detected <em>when you aren't letting the person know you are doing it or letting them make a saving throw to defend against it.</em></p><p></p><p>That's the big thing for me. If you are trying to avoid being detected and the person has no defense against your detection... you're just not going to get very much detail.</p><p></p><p>Remember, there is already another 2nd level spell called 'Zone of Truth' which does what it appears as though folks are wanting 'Detect Thoughts' to do when running an interrogation scene-- determine whether the person is telling the truth. From what I'm gathering, the idea they are hoping for is that during the interrogation scene and by scanning surface thoughts round after round, they'd get pings like "That question made the person nervous! They know something!" Or "That person walled themselves off when they answered that question... they're probably lying."</p><p></p><p>If that is what you are trying to do with Detect Thoughts... use it as a lie detector test... then I absolutely believe you should HAVE to "probe deeper". The person not only needs to know you are probing inside their mind to get information, but that they should have a chance to center themselves and not let you do it (via a saving throw). After all... 'Zone of Truth' is already our lie detector spell, and that one not only requires a saving throw for it to even work at all, but the person under its influence is under no obligation to actually talk to you (when if they did, they would have to tell the truth.)</p><p></p><p>To use the surface level 'Detect Thoughts' to figure out if someone is lying where the target doesn't know you are doing it <em><strong>and</strong></em> they have no way to defend themselves... that's a big no-no for me. We have 'Zone of Truth' in the game already for a reason.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 7552003, member: 7006"] If you are a DM who actually gives different "surface thoughts" each round, then sure, I can understand your POV. For me though, as I said above... I don't run surface thoughts that way. Surface thoughts do not change round to round. They have an overriding attitude and that's what gets detected [I]when you aren't letting the person know you are doing it or letting them make a saving throw to defend against it.[/I] That's the big thing for me. If you are trying to avoid being detected and the person has no defense against your detection... you're just not going to get very much detail. Remember, there is already another 2nd level spell called 'Zone of Truth' which does what it appears as though folks are wanting 'Detect Thoughts' to do when running an interrogation scene-- determine whether the person is telling the truth. From what I'm gathering, the idea they are hoping for is that during the interrogation scene and by scanning surface thoughts round after round, they'd get pings like "That question made the person nervous! They know something!" Or "That person walled themselves off when they answered that question... they're probably lying." If that is what you are trying to do with Detect Thoughts... use it as a lie detector test... then I absolutely believe you should HAVE to "probe deeper". The person not only needs to know you are probing inside their mind to get information, but that they should have a chance to center themselves and not let you do it (via a saving throw). After all... 'Zone of Truth' is already our lie detector spell, and that one not only requires a saving throw for it to even work at all, but the person under its influence is under no obligation to actually talk to you (when if they did, they would have to tell the truth.) To use the surface level 'Detect Thoughts' to figure out if someone is lying where the target doesn't know you are doing it [I][B]and[/B][/I] they have no way to defend themselves... that's a big no-no for me. We have 'Zone of Truth' in the game already for a reason. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Detect Thoughts spell doubt: can I concentrate on the target without going deeper into its mind?
Top