Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mamba" data-source="post: 8970539" data-attributes="member: 7034611">I did not say it was not profitable, I doubted it outsold 3e (for the record that is 3e and 3.5 vs 4e and essentials, we already do not have reliable numbers for that, no need to break it down further)I have no numbers for 3e or 4e or we would not have this discussion <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />not really, 4e and essentials were about 2 years each, so 3e and 4e works maybe, but the 3e refresh lasted as long as all of 4eno disagreement thereI never said it was not profitable, I said I have no reason to believe it outsold 3eAs to debunking, that would require you to have some data, so no luck there unfortunatelyfunny, I feel this way about what you write</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mamba, post: 8970539, member: 7034611"] I did not say it was not profitable, I doubted it outsold 3e (for the record that is 3e and 3.5 vs 4e and essentials, we already do not have reliable numbers for that, no need to break it down further) I have no numbers for 3e or 4e or we would not have this discussion ;) not really, 4e and essentials were about 2 years each, so 3e and 4e works maybe, but the 3e refresh lasted as long as all of 4e no disagreement there I never said it was not profitable, I said I have no reason to believe it outsold 3e As to debunking, that would require you to have some data, so no luck there unfortunately funny, I feel this way about what you write [/QUOTE]

Verification