Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dexterity & Agility - are we missing something?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 3940544" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>Exactly.</p><p></p><p>I liked discussions of these sort once, but nowadays I find them of little use. Because there is really no reason why you should divide things in 6 rather than 2 rather than 12 rather than 100 rather than 20...</p><p></p><p>The 3.0 skill system had a purpose (not the only purpose): to create a second-tier distinction of abilities, underneath the one of the 6 abilities. About 40 skills were created, which represent specialized uses of the 6 abilities, and that was a good choice of numbers 6 -> 40.</p><p></p><p>Early products from 3rd party added lots of new skills into the fray, partially misunderstanding skills for additional abilities like feats. The discussion concentrated on skills alone, not in relation to ability scores, and was polluted by the usual tendency of every gamer to make characters more powerful rather than less powerful: so the original usefulness inbalances between skills were "fixed" by suggesting merging of less-useful skills (same result could have been achieved by splitting the best ones, but no one wants a weaker PC).</p><p></p><p>Because there is really no reason to have a specific number of skills if you look at them in a vacuum, and every number is ok, but it feels better for you PC to get more abilities for the same price, many if not actually MOST of the gaming groups have lowered the skill list progressively more. At some point, if you never stop, you eventually end up with 6 skills... equivalent to the 6 ability scores!</p><p></p><p>Then at the same time some (but in this case, it's not widespread) some groups feel the need to differentiate between more than 6 different ability. Note that you could actually do the opposite here too: there is no reason why you couldn't just have 2 ability scores, "Body" and "Mind".</p><p></p><p>Personally I think this reveals that there is always a drive for differentiating, because differentiating allows for more combinations i.e. more diversity between characters. The opposite drive is simplificating, for the sake of making the game easier. There is no true point in between, you just need to make your choice. But I think it's important to see that ability scores and skills together achieve something greater than individually: because when you want a "dexterous" PC and an "agile" PC, you can already have them, just by balancing them differently between Dex and different skills.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 3940544, member: 1465"] Exactly. I liked discussions of these sort once, but nowadays I find them of little use. Because there is really no reason why you should divide things in 6 rather than 2 rather than 12 rather than 100 rather than 20... The 3.0 skill system had a purpose (not the only purpose): to create a second-tier distinction of abilities, underneath the one of the 6 abilities. About 40 skills were created, which represent specialized uses of the 6 abilities, and that was a good choice of numbers 6 -> 40. Early products from 3rd party added lots of new skills into the fray, partially misunderstanding skills for additional abilities like feats. The discussion concentrated on skills alone, not in relation to ability scores, and was polluted by the usual tendency of every gamer to make characters more powerful rather than less powerful: so the original usefulness inbalances between skills were "fixed" by suggesting merging of less-useful skills (same result could have been achieved by splitting the best ones, but no one wants a weaker PC). Because there is really no reason to have a specific number of skills if you look at them in a vacuum, and every number is ok, but it feels better for you PC to get more abilities for the same price, many if not actually MOST of the gaming groups have lowered the skill list progressively more. At some point, if you never stop, you eventually end up with 6 skills... equivalent to the 6 ability scores! Then at the same time some (but in this case, it's not widespread) some groups feel the need to differentiate between more than 6 different ability. Note that you could actually do the opposite here too: there is no reason why you couldn't just have 2 ability scores, "Body" and "Mind". Personally I think this reveals that there is always a drive for differentiating, because differentiating allows for more combinations i.e. more diversity between characters. The opposite drive is simplificating, for the sake of making the game easier. There is no true point in between, you just need to make your choice. But I think it's important to see that ability scores and skills together achieve something greater than individually: because when you want a "dexterous" PC and an "agile" PC, you can already have them, just by balancing them differently between Dex and different skills. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dexterity & Agility - are we missing something?
Top