Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Theory of Games" data-source="post: 9706950" data-attributes="member: 7042201">Except 5e started with:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">less than ten races and now it's over forty</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">less than fifteen backgrounds and now it's over fifty</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">less than fifteen classes and now it's over one hundred (with the subclasses)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">less than fifty feats and now it's over one hundred</li> </ul>Power-creep involves everything that comprises a character in terms of capability.The new encounter-building math? As in Challenge Rating? I'm still seeing GMs complain about how broken it is.[EMBED content="thread-703930"]https://www.enworld.org/threads/level-challenge-rating.703930/[/EMBED]And please understand we're not looking for "perfect" - we just want something that works. This is the only area where WotC has been consistent: leaving GMs without the necessary tools to run the system and 5e's co-designer Mike Mearls said the very same thing.Which explains why D&D isn't doing as well as anticipated.</blockquote>