Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Did I do the right thing?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fusangite" data-source="post: 2176513" data-attributes="member: 7240"><p>In the mid 1990s, researchers at the University of Calgary came up with quite an interesting plan. They ran a series of tests on people with different blood-alcohol levels with very realistic driving simulations (halfway between an videogame and VR with the person sitting in a complete driver's seat replica) and they found that some people could learn to drive drunk, basically compensating for changes in reaction time, etc. to the point where they could drive drunk better than the average person could drive sober. Of course they didn't find this was the case with all alcoholics or even all regular drinkers. Basically, they found that some people can be trained to drive with quite a bit of alcohol in their system whereas others are harder to train or untrainable up to the above average level of reaction time and precision their study was looking for.</p><p></p><p>Surprisingly, they found that it didn't take that many sessions to train certain people to drive drunk. And we see this in reality with alcoholics; some who have been drinking for years are a menace on the road as soon as they pass the legal limit whereas others have trained themselves quite effectively. </p><p></p><p>The researchers recommended a policy change whereby our default should go from the current two-drink limit to zero tolerance so that a person with a standard license could be charged with any level of alcohol in their system. A person who wanted to drive drunk would have to pay extra to get a special license (because a bunch of extra testing would be involved) that permitted them to drive with whatever level of alcohol in their system they could demonstrate to the people running the tests that they could handle.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, you asked for an option. That's one example. There are probably others but that's the only version I've heard a radio documentary about. Of course, there technically would still be a legal limit: for a regular license it would be zero but for a special license it would be variable and printed on the license and entered into a database. Of course, dangerous driving would still be illegal, regardless of a person's blood alcohol level.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fusangite, post: 2176513, member: 7240"] In the mid 1990s, researchers at the University of Calgary came up with quite an interesting plan. They ran a series of tests on people with different blood-alcohol levels with very realistic driving simulations (halfway between an videogame and VR with the person sitting in a complete driver's seat replica) and they found that some people could learn to drive drunk, basically compensating for changes in reaction time, etc. to the point where they could drive drunk better than the average person could drive sober. Of course they didn't find this was the case with all alcoholics or even all regular drinkers. Basically, they found that some people can be trained to drive with quite a bit of alcohol in their system whereas others are harder to train or untrainable up to the above average level of reaction time and precision their study was looking for. Surprisingly, they found that it didn't take that many sessions to train certain people to drive drunk. And we see this in reality with alcoholics; some who have been drinking for years are a menace on the road as soon as they pass the legal limit whereas others have trained themselves quite effectively. The researchers recommended a policy change whereby our default should go from the current two-drink limit to zero tolerance so that a person with a standard license could be charged with any level of alcohol in their system. A person who wanted to drive drunk would have to pay extra to get a special license (because a bunch of extra testing would be involved) that permitted them to drive with whatever level of alcohol in their system they could demonstrate to the people running the tests that they could handle. Anyway, you asked for an option. That's one example. There are probably others but that's the only version I've heard a radio documentary about. Of course, there technically would still be a legal limit: for a regular license it would be zero but for a special license it would be variable and printed on the license and entered into a database. Of course, dangerous driving would still be illegal, regardless of a person's blood alcohol level. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Did I do the right thing?
Top