Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Gnostic Goblin" data-source="post: 9535446" data-attributes="member: 7048243">How is using the word ‘inclusive’ a sign that the post is anti-inclusive?  I was not using the word as a negative thing. I was using the word as a word to mean what it means.  Did the post-millennial gaming industry become more inclusive ? Or more to the point; Was there in that time a huge public awareness about the idea of inclusivity?I argue yes to both.I did not say I believe it to be a bad thing.I have my whole life fought for inclusivity.The comment was about how post-millennial generation of gamers outnumber oldschool gamers. This is a sign the nerds won, if winning involves going mainstream, attracting many more players. However, the idea that there is an OSR as opposed to how the majority of gamers, the younger gamers do it, mean there are two distinct groups - the community has split.I am asking whover tagged my post to contemplate if discussing that a thing exists is the same as criticising it for existing? I believe I intended to discuss that it exists. I believe I did not insult it for existing. My point was the opposite to that. Thus, I believe the tag is incorrect.</blockquote>