Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Did WotC underestimate the Paizo effect on 4E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dykstrav" data-source="post: 5265533" data-attributes="member: 40522"><p>I don't think that anyone (either Wizards of the Coast or Paizo) underestimated Paizo's effect on the industry. Paizo was known for quality content before Pathfinder, and they are known for quality content after Pathfinder. It's not as if they would or would not have produced quality content dependent upon whatever happened with 4E.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is a particularly relevant observation. Not everyone jumps on board when a new edition rolls into town--I personally know of three 1E games, two 2E games, and a small smattering of 3E and 3.5 games (not including Pathfinder) in my area. These people didn't see any reason to switch editions just because a new one rolled out, they stuck with the one they already liked. Official support for a favored game doesn't play as big a part in these preferences as some people think. I myself am running a <em>Vampire: the Masquerade</em> game now, even though official support ended for it six years ago, and it's been so successful that I'm even looking at starting up a <em>Wraith: the Oblivion</em> game, which was officially discontinued in 1999... Lack of official support certainly doesn't make a great product any less great.</p><p></p><p>But a bit more on topic... Given the nature of the OGL, I think that someone would have come along to sell new material to 3.5 fans if Paizo wasn't around. It's basic supply and demand. The market demanded more OGL 3.5 material and the company that decided to supply the products was Paizo--it could have been someone else if Paizo wasn't around, but for my part, I'm glad that it's Paizo. My flavor of D&D is in good hands.</p><p></p><p>I also think that it's a winning proposition for Wizards of the Coast. Since I'm not really interested in more 4E products as they stand now, they can feel free to shape the game in ways that appeal to other customers. I get continuing support for my favored version of the game, but the people who don't like it get a version of the game they like too. Good times for everyone as far as I can see.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dykstrav, post: 5265533, member: 40522"] I don't think that anyone (either Wizards of the Coast or Paizo) underestimated Paizo's effect on the industry. Paizo was known for quality content before Pathfinder, and they are known for quality content after Pathfinder. It's not as if they would or would not have produced quality content dependent upon whatever happened with 4E. This is a particularly relevant observation. Not everyone jumps on board when a new edition rolls into town--I personally know of three 1E games, two 2E games, and a small smattering of 3E and 3.5 games (not including Pathfinder) in my area. These people didn't see any reason to switch editions just because a new one rolled out, they stuck with the one they already liked. Official support for a favored game doesn't play as big a part in these preferences as some people think. I myself am running a [I]Vampire: the Masquerade[/I] game now, even though official support ended for it six years ago, and it's been so successful that I'm even looking at starting up a [I]Wraith: the Oblivion[/I] game, which was officially discontinued in 1999... Lack of official support certainly doesn't make a great product any less great. But a bit more on topic... Given the nature of the OGL, I think that someone would have come along to sell new material to 3.5 fans if Paizo wasn't around. It's basic supply and demand. The market demanded more OGL 3.5 material and the company that decided to supply the products was Paizo--it could have been someone else if Paizo wasn't around, but for my part, I'm glad that it's Paizo. My flavor of D&D is in good hands. I also think that it's a winning proposition for Wizards of the Coast. Since I'm not really interested in more 4E products as they stand now, they can feel free to shape the game in ways that appeal to other customers. I get continuing support for my favored version of the game, but the people who don't like it get a version of the game they like too. Good times for everyone as far as I can see. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Did WotC underestimate the Paizo effect on 4E?
Top