Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Did WotC underestimate the Paizo effect on 4E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steel_Wind" data-source="post: 5265578" data-attributes="member: 20741"><p><em>Of course</em> they underestimated them. They are now competing with their own IP, rebranded by another company and sold in direct competition with their own products. In some areas, it's a competition they are losing, too.</p><p></p><p>The suggestion that WotC is not "competing" against Paizo is fallacious. It assumes that those customers who purchased <em>Pathfinder</em> products were never going to purchase 4E products, no matter what. Take away that unjustified and breathtakingly dismissive assumption - and that argument has no clothes -- and no logic.</p><p></p><p>It's one thing to say that some players would stick with 3.5 and won't buy 4E and so they are not "WotC's potential customers" for 4E. But that's not what has happened with <em>Pathfinder</em>. Paizo has sold a new game based upon the old, and most people who are playing it don't bother to even use 3.5 books within their <em>Pathfinder</em> games at all. </p><p></p><p>If that's not competition in RPGs, then I don't know what is.</p><p></p><p> <em>Pathfinder</em> and D&D are not competing products in the marketplace, even though now both are being sold on the shelves of major book retailers and not just in hobby game stores? The presence of competitors on the shelves of mainstream book sellers is a new phenomenon for WotC. It is as clear a sign of real competition in the marketplace that exists. To hand wave away the presence of those books on the shelves of Big Box Retailers and describe that product as "not in competition" with D&D? I think that's a <span style="color: Orange"><strong><em>plainly </em><em>nutty</em></strong></span> statement, that's what I think it is. </p><p></p><p>Paizo had legitimacy and a claim to the goodwill of fans as "real" owners of D&D given their stewardship of both <em>Dungeon </em>and <em>Dragon </em>magazine. They have leveraged that goodwill and the OGL into a brand that actually competes favorably in the marketplace with D&D.</p><p></p><p>Did WotC expect this would happen? <strong>Not a frikkin' chance</strong>. Did Paizo think this would happen? I expect they HOPED it would happen, but...no. PFRPG's success has exceeded their own best case scenario as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steel_Wind, post: 5265578, member: 20741"] [I]Of course[/I] they underestimated them. They are now competing with their own IP, rebranded by another company and sold in direct competition with their own products. In some areas, it's a competition they are losing, too. The suggestion that WotC is not "competing" against Paizo is fallacious. It assumes that those customers who purchased [I]Pathfinder[/I] products were never going to purchase 4E products, no matter what. Take away that unjustified and breathtakingly dismissive assumption - and that argument has no clothes -- and no logic. It's one thing to say that some players would stick with 3.5 and won't buy 4E and so they are not "WotC's potential customers" for 4E. But that's not what has happened with [I]Pathfinder[/I]. Paizo has sold a new game based upon the old, and most people who are playing it don't bother to even use 3.5 books within their [I]Pathfinder[/I] games at all. If that's not competition in RPGs, then I don't know what is. [I]Pathfinder[/I] and D&D are not competing products in the marketplace, even though now both are being sold on the shelves of major book retailers and not just in hobby game stores? The presence of competitors on the shelves of mainstream book sellers is a new phenomenon for WotC. It is as clear a sign of real competition in the marketplace that exists. To hand wave away the presence of those books on the shelves of Big Box Retailers and describe that product as "not in competition" with D&D? I think that's a [COLOR=Orange][B][I]plainly [/I][I]nutty[/I][/B][/COLOR] statement, that's what I think it is. Paizo had legitimacy and a claim to the goodwill of fans as "real" owners of D&D given their stewardship of both [I]Dungeon [/I]and [I]Dragon [/I]magazine. They have leveraged that goodwill and the OGL into a brand that actually competes favorably in the marketplace with D&D. Did WotC expect this would happen? [B]Not a frikkin' chance[/B]. Did Paizo think this would happen? I expect they HOPED it would happen, but...no. PFRPG's success has exceeded their own best case scenario as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Did WotC underestimate the Paizo effect on 4E?
Top