Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Did WotC underestimate the Paizo effect on 4E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Balthaczar" data-source="post: 5265930" data-attributes="member: 54882"><p>To late for the earlier poll? My group and I were playing 3.5 Rise of the Runelords. 4e was coming down the line and we were genuinely excited. At the end of Runelords we had planned on switching and going fresh. 4e came out, turned out it was nothing like what we wanted so we stuck with 3.5. I was going to keep doing Ap's and buying pathfinder supplements because of the quality. Switched to ALPHA ,BETA and Final and have not looked back.</p><p>I think the style and release strategy of the Essential line answers this threads main premise. While Scott Rouse did say they had a multiyear strategy, and one of those years was bringing in new players, this is a bit of a modification of that. The classes have 3rd edition and a smattering of 2e glued on to 4e style and rules. WOTC also experimented with a 32 page players supplement that seemed familiar. They have felt the competition, they have altered the product lines because of the competition. They defiantly underestimated Paizo. If they thought Paizo was a bigger threat they may not have dithered with the GSL or changed a few things. </p><p>apologies for the jumbles, at work and had to interrupt several times thus screwballing my noodle. also since tone does not register, i am not trying to sarcastic or aggressive, i really have enjoyed this thread and contribute what my group has experienced</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Balthaczar, post: 5265930, member: 54882"] To late for the earlier poll? My group and I were playing 3.5 Rise of the Runelords. 4e was coming down the line and we were genuinely excited. At the end of Runelords we had planned on switching and going fresh. 4e came out, turned out it was nothing like what we wanted so we stuck with 3.5. I was going to keep doing Ap's and buying pathfinder supplements because of the quality. Switched to ALPHA ,BETA and Final and have not looked back. I think the style and release strategy of the Essential line answers this threads main premise. While Scott Rouse did say they had a multiyear strategy, and one of those years was bringing in new players, this is a bit of a modification of that. The classes have 3rd edition and a smattering of 2e glued on to 4e style and rules. WOTC also experimented with a 32 page players supplement that seemed familiar. They have felt the competition, they have altered the product lines because of the competition. They defiantly underestimated Paizo. If they thought Paizo was a bigger threat they may not have dithered with the GSL or changed a few things. apologies for the jumbles, at work and had to interrupt several times thus screwballing my noodle. also since tone does not register, i am not trying to sarcastic or aggressive, i really have enjoyed this thread and contribute what my group has experienced [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Did WotC underestimate the Paizo effect on 4E?
Top