Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Difference between critical hits and automatic hits.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tormyr" data-source="post: 6374572" data-attributes="member: 6776887"><p>Please be more careful about how you go about your arguing. As has been demonstrated in this thread, many intelligent people have come down on both sides of this (extremely minor) issue. I believe that the rules can be interpreted two different ways depending on where you start. While the Champions text says you score a critical hit, a critical hit is defined in the rules as double damage. For some reason, they went out of their way to define a 20 as automatically hitting and then said it is additionally a critical hit. Meanwhile, both the Champion text and the Critical Hit text use the phrase "score a critical hit". It can reasonably be read both ways, and it very easily could have been changed slightly to leave no ambiguity anywhere in the text while still using natural language. I came here to ask the community for their reasoned opinion more for interest than worrying about something I might not see for years.</p><p></p><p>I have been hugely satisfied (happy, ecstatic) with 5e. My players think I have an even hand running the table and make common sense rulings. I have a firm grasp of the English language. I started this thread admitting that this was an extreme corner case. Please do not insinuate that I or anyone else who has commented in a manner contrary to your opinion are unhappy with 5e, lack common sense, are focused on rules-lawyering or misunderstand basic rules of the English language.</p><p></p><p>Even if you are right in an argument, you can be wrong based on how you deliver it.</p><p></p><p>Sorry for blasting you on this. I doubt you meant what you wrote as an insult. I already PMed somebody else about their arguments starting to move from being about the subject at hand to about the person on the other side of the argument. Your post was the second that I have seen moving in that direction. One of the things I have appreciated about these boards (the D&D section; I don't really go elsewhere) is the lack of fighting and flame wars (at least since I have been on the boards). I have looked on on several other boards where people act poorly, and I appreciate that it does not seem to take hold here.</p><p></p><p>I think as much as possible has been said about 3 paragraphs in the PHB. It may be time to let this post slide off of the first page. I had no idea my question would spawn this much discussion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tormyr, post: 6374572, member: 6776887"] Please be more careful about how you go about your arguing. As has been demonstrated in this thread, many intelligent people have come down on both sides of this (extremely minor) issue. I believe that the rules can be interpreted two different ways depending on where you start. While the Champions text says you score a critical hit, a critical hit is defined in the rules as double damage. For some reason, they went out of their way to define a 20 as automatically hitting and then said it is additionally a critical hit. Meanwhile, both the Champion text and the Critical Hit text use the phrase "score a critical hit". It can reasonably be read both ways, and it very easily could have been changed slightly to leave no ambiguity anywhere in the text while still using natural language. I came here to ask the community for their reasoned opinion more for interest than worrying about something I might not see for years. I have been hugely satisfied (happy, ecstatic) with 5e. My players think I have an even hand running the table and make common sense rulings. I have a firm grasp of the English language. I started this thread admitting that this was an extreme corner case. Please do not insinuate that I or anyone else who has commented in a manner contrary to your opinion are unhappy with 5e, lack common sense, are focused on rules-lawyering or misunderstand basic rules of the English language. Even if you are right in an argument, you can be wrong based on how you deliver it. Sorry for blasting you on this. I doubt you meant what you wrote as an insult. I already PMed somebody else about their arguments starting to move from being about the subject at hand to about the person on the other side of the argument. Your post was the second that I have seen moving in that direction. One of the things I have appreciated about these boards (the D&D section; I don't really go elsewhere) is the lack of fighting and flame wars (at least since I have been on the boards). I have looked on on several other boards where people act poorly, and I appreciate that it does not seem to take hold here. I think as much as possible has been said about 3 paragraphs in the PHB. It may be time to let this post slide off of the first page. I had no idea my question would spawn this much discussion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Difference between critical hits and automatic hits.
Top