Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Difference From 10 Years Ago?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 6181571" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>I've noticed this "weapon" attitude too, but personally don't really relate to it. (Maybe that's because of my professional background - I'm an academic lawyer and philosopher, so am used to reading analyses of things that I don't necessarily agree with.)</p><p></p><p>When I first read The Forge articles I was GMing Rolemaster, and The Forge captured much better than any design book both the purist-for-system simulation rationale of Rolemaster, but also - in its discussion of metagame-leveragable mechanics - explained to me why I much preferred RM to RQ despite their common simulationist goals.</p><p></p><p>I take it for granted that most of the actual Forge personalities would regard my 4e game as pretty low brow, if not outright puerile and derivative. But given that I'm not playing with them, that's not my problem! What's relevant for me is that they introduced me to mechanics and other techniques that I can use, even if I'm using them in pursuit of aesthetic goals that the Forge-ites themselves wouldn't care for.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 6181571, member: 42582"] I've noticed this "weapon" attitude too, but personally don't really relate to it. (Maybe that's because of my professional background - I'm an academic lawyer and philosopher, so am used to reading analyses of things that I don't necessarily agree with.) When I first read The Forge articles I was GMing Rolemaster, and The Forge captured much better than any design book both the purist-for-system simulation rationale of Rolemaster, but also - in its discussion of metagame-leveragable mechanics - explained to me why I much preferred RM to RQ despite their common simulationist goals. I take it for granted that most of the actual Forge personalities would regard my 4e game as pretty low brow, if not outright puerile and derivative. But given that I'm not playing with them, that's not my problem! What's relevant for me is that they introduced me to mechanics and other techniques that I can use, even if I'm using them in pursuit of aesthetic goals that the Forge-ites themselves wouldn't care for. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Difference From 10 Years Ago?
Top