Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Differences between Pentium and Celron CPU's?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="drothgery" data-source="post: 1697516" data-attributes="member: 360"><p>Intel calls their budget CPUs Celerons. There are three* different current CPUs that Intel calls Celerons these days.</p><p> </p><p>By far the most common of these is 'Northwood'-based Celeron. It's basically a Pentium 4 with 128K of level-2 cache (really fast memory that's used instead of your system RAM whenever possible) instead of the 512K that 'Northwood'-based Pentium 4s have, and a 400MHz 'front side bus', rather than the 533MHz or 800 MHz of a Pentium 4 (so the CPU communicates with the rest of the system at a lower speed). The problem with this is that the Pentium 4 architecture is really dependent on memory bandwidth, so small amounts of cache and slow bus speeds are really bad. Even the fastest Northwood-based Celerons (2.8 GHz) aren't as fast as the slowest Northwood-based Pentium 4s. This Celeron is one that you should never buy, unless it's in a very cheap system that will never be used for gaming or any other demanding applications.</p><p> </p><p>Intel has just released a new Celeron, called the Celeron D, which is based on the 'Prescott' core. It's nowhere near as crippled as the 'Northwood' Celeron, as it's got 256K of level 2 cache and 533 MHz front side bus; the Prescott-based Pentium 4 'E' has 1MB of level 2 cache and an 800 MHz front side bus. This chip actually is a decent low-end CPU (a Pentium 4 E clocked at the same speed as a Celeron D is significantly faster, but nowhere near to the same degree), but it's really new. You still don't want to use it in a high-end gaming box, though.</p><p> </p><p>And in some notebooks, you'll see Intel's Celeron M CPU. This one is based on the Pentium M (the CPU in any notebook with a Centrino label). Since the Pentium M is an excellent notebook CPU, Celeron M based notebooks aren't half bad either. Like all Celerons, the Celeron M has less level 2 cache than its 'big brother', but in the case of the Celeron M, it's got half the cache of the Pentium M, rather than one quarter, runs at the same front side bus speed, and the Pentium M design is nowhere near as dependendent on memory bandwidth as the Pentium 4 design (so the difference in cache matters far less). The main problem with these is that they tend to be clocked somewhat slower than their Pentium M based cousins.</p><p> </p><p>* Technically, there are four. The Xbox CPU is an older, Pentium III-based Celeron. But I think that's the only way you can easily get that version of the Celeron anymore.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="drothgery, post: 1697516, member: 360"] Intel calls their budget CPUs Celerons. There are three* different current CPUs that Intel calls Celerons these days. By far the most common of these is 'Northwood'-based Celeron. It's basically a Pentium 4 with 128K of level-2 cache (really fast memory that's used instead of your system RAM whenever possible) instead of the 512K that 'Northwood'-based Pentium 4s have, and a 400MHz 'front side bus', rather than the 533MHz or 800 MHz of a Pentium 4 (so the CPU communicates with the rest of the system at a lower speed). The problem with this is that the Pentium 4 architecture is really dependent on memory bandwidth, so small amounts of cache and slow bus speeds are really bad. Even the fastest Northwood-based Celerons (2.8 GHz) aren't as fast as the slowest Northwood-based Pentium 4s. This Celeron is one that you should never buy, unless it's in a very cheap system that will never be used for gaming or any other demanding applications. Intel has just released a new Celeron, called the Celeron D, which is based on the 'Prescott' core. It's nowhere near as crippled as the 'Northwood' Celeron, as it's got 256K of level 2 cache and 533 MHz front side bus; the Prescott-based Pentium 4 'E' has 1MB of level 2 cache and an 800 MHz front side bus. This chip actually is a decent low-end CPU (a Pentium 4 E clocked at the same speed as a Celeron D is significantly faster, but nowhere near to the same degree), but it's really new. You still don't want to use it in a high-end gaming box, though. And in some notebooks, you'll see Intel's Celeron M CPU. This one is based on the Pentium M (the CPU in any notebook with a Centrino label). Since the Pentium M is an excellent notebook CPU, Celeron M based notebooks aren't half bad either. Like all Celerons, the Celeron M has less level 2 cache than its 'big brother', but in the case of the Celeron M, it's got half the cache of the Pentium M, rather than one quarter, runs at the same front side bus speed, and the Pentium M design is nowhere near as dependendent on memory bandwidth as the Pentium 4 design (so the difference in cache matters far less). The main problem with these is that they tend to be clocked somewhat slower than their Pentium M based cousins. * Technically, there are four. The Xbox CPU is an older, Pentium III-based Celeron. But I think that's the only way you can easily get that version of the Celeron anymore. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Differences between Pentium and Celron CPU's?
Top