Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 6783219" data-attributes="member: 177">That Sith exist(ed), sure.&nbsp; But that doesn't mean *everyone* who uses the Dark Side is a Sith.Consider that in the Prequels, Yoda says there are always two Sith - master and apprentice.&nbsp; When Palpatine and Anakin are both killed, there's no surviving master to take a new apprentice - the Sith may be a dead tradition.In the EU, the Sith arose from one culture.&nbsp; Sith is merely one philosophical framework and training tradition. They are by *no* means the only Dark Side force users out there.&nbsp; Also, the Jedi are not the only ones who are not Dark Side.&nbsp; Anyone who falls to anger, fear, and pain will be Dark Side.&nbsp;&nbsp; A Jedi who succumbs could just be a Dark Jedi, if not directly taught Sithiness.Not that this means that anything specific from the EU is applied here, but the idea remains that the end of Sidious and Vader does not imply the end of fear and anger.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 6783219, member: 177"] That Sith exist(ed), sure. But that doesn't mean *everyone* who uses the Dark Side is a Sith. Consider that in the Prequels, Yoda says there are always two Sith - master and apprentice. When Palpatine and Anakin are both killed, there's no surviving master to take a new apprentice - the Sith may be a dead tradition. In the EU, the Sith arose from one culture. Sith is merely one philosophical framework and training tradition. They are by *no* means the only Dark Side force users out there. Also, the Jedi are not the only ones who are not Dark Side. Anyone who falls to anger, fear, and pain will be Dark Side. A Jedi who succumbs could just be a Dark Jedi, if not directly taught Sithiness. Not that this means that anything specific from the EU is applied here, but the idea remains that the end of Sidious and Vader does not imply the end of fear and anger. [/QUOTE]

Verification