Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FreeTheSlaves" data-source="post: 4011407" data-attributes="member: 9952">I think the introduction of the dinosaur was poorly handled if a goal was to keep the group intact. After 1.5 years people get to know each other, so I'm guessing that how this dinosaur introduction turned out is not quite so surprising to the people involved.Bluntly, all people share fault because the end result goes something like:1) The player of the dinosaur riding druid does not get to play a dinosaur riding druid,2) Players 2 & 3 are looking for a game elsewhere,3) The dm has work to do to restart the campaign or start afresh.I personally feel it is much better to have players and dm really commit to keeping the game alive and enjoyable for all. The principles of 'give and take' were abandoned for 'take and leave', and thus this thread. Regardless of the divide (and I think both main arguments have merit) the best thing I'm taking from this discussion is the need to listen to, discuss and address player/dm concerns.</blockquote>