Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Disable Device and Thieves' Tools.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kobold Stew" data-source="post: 6065151" data-attributes="member: 23484"><p>From the Christmas morning character-building session, some odd inconsistencies emerged concerning rogues and the disable device skill.</p><p></p><p>In brief: <strong>the rogue's proficiency with thieves’ tools is a needless complication that limits options and offers no benefit. It should go</strong>.</p><p></p><p>Now the long version: </p><p></p><p>First, the rules:</p><p>a. All rogues have proficiency with thieves’ tools (Classes, p. 19).</p><p>*b. All schemes except the Rake give proficiency with Disable Device (Classes, p. 21)</p><p>c. Guild Thief is the only background that provides Disable device (Backgrounds, p. 4).</p><p>d. Disable device makes no specific reference to the need for tools (Backgrounds, p. 8).</p><p>e. Characters proficient with thieves’ tools can use them to find and disarm traps to open locks (Equipment, p. 10). Thieves’ tools are needed to disarm traps (Classes p. 19; Equipment p. 10).</p><p>f. Characters proficient with thieves’ tools can pick a lock (Equipment, p. 9) – tools are not mentioned.</p><p>*g. When using thieves’ tools, a character proficient with thieves’ tools gets +2 on checks (Equipment, p. 11). </p><p>*h. Rogues proficient with disable device will add the higher of two rolls of their skill die (Classes, p. 20). </p><p></p><p>(Points marked with * are new to this test packet.)</p><p></p><p>From this emerges the following observations or inconsistencies:</p><p></p><p>1. Despite all the hyped modularity, the thieves’ tool requirement effectively restricts opening locks and disabling traps to rogues.</p><p></p><p>2. A non-rogue character that learns Disable device through the Guild Thief background, or through Superior skill training (Specialties, p. 10) will not be able to use it to disable devices or open locks, since she cannot gain proficiency in thieves’ tools. </p><p></p><p>3. As a result, the guild thief background (as written) will only be chosen by rogues unless disable device is swapped out for another skill).</p><p></p><p>4. A rake who is not a guild thief has a proficiency they cannot use.</p><p></p><p>5. Every use of disable device will regularly receive +2 and the higher of two skill rolls on the skill die.</p><p></p><p>Point 5 is in fact the biggest problem here: every use of a single skill is always modified in two ways. The requirement for proficiency with tools provides needless obstacles and obstructs several interesting builds. </p><p></p><p>There’s also a problem because the game has only one tool proficiency: it’s an unnecessary mechanic. </p><p></p><p>Suggested fixes:</p><p>* Remove the proficiency with thieves’ tools from rogues (a). Anyone with Disable device (not just rogues) uses them to disable traps or pick locks. This resolves the issues pertaining to the Rake (b), the Guild Thief (c), and Superior Skill training. It also means that one can conceive of a Disable device roll that does not necessarily benefit from a Rogue’s Skill mastery (h).</p><p></p><p>* Remove the bonus to the roll granted by tools (g). This needlessly inflates the DC of every lock, and allows what amounts to a trivial non-magical object to meaningfully impact a skill roll. If nothing else, it sets a bad precedent.</p><p></p><p>* Allow locks to be picked by anyone with Disable device, rather than anyone proficient with thieves’ tools (f).</p><p></p><p>Any thoughts, as always, appreciated. In a world with Hedge Magicians and Mystic Healers, is there a reason to limit full use of the Disable Device skill to Rogues?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kobold Stew, post: 6065151, member: 23484"] From the Christmas morning character-building session, some odd inconsistencies emerged concerning rogues and the disable device skill. In brief: [B]the rogue's proficiency with thieves’ tools is a needless complication that limits options and offers no benefit. It should go[/B]. Now the long version: First, the rules: a. All rogues have proficiency with thieves’ tools (Classes, p. 19). *b. All schemes except the Rake give proficiency with Disable Device (Classes, p. 21) c. Guild Thief is the only background that provides Disable device (Backgrounds, p. 4). d. Disable device makes no specific reference to the need for tools (Backgrounds, p. 8). e. Characters proficient with thieves’ tools can use them to find and disarm traps to open locks (Equipment, p. 10). Thieves’ tools are needed to disarm traps (Classes p. 19; Equipment p. 10). f. Characters proficient with thieves’ tools can pick a lock (Equipment, p. 9) – tools are not mentioned. *g. When using thieves’ tools, a character proficient with thieves’ tools gets +2 on checks (Equipment, p. 11). *h. Rogues proficient with disable device will add the higher of two rolls of their skill die (Classes, p. 20). (Points marked with * are new to this test packet.) From this emerges the following observations or inconsistencies: 1. Despite all the hyped modularity, the thieves’ tool requirement effectively restricts opening locks and disabling traps to rogues. 2. A non-rogue character that learns Disable device through the Guild Thief background, or through Superior skill training (Specialties, p. 10) will not be able to use it to disable devices or open locks, since she cannot gain proficiency in thieves’ tools. 3. As a result, the guild thief background (as written) will only be chosen by rogues unless disable device is swapped out for another skill). 4. A rake who is not a guild thief has a proficiency they cannot use. 5. Every use of disable device will regularly receive +2 and the higher of two skill rolls on the skill die. Point 5 is in fact the biggest problem here: every use of a single skill is always modified in two ways. The requirement for proficiency with tools provides needless obstacles and obstructs several interesting builds. There’s also a problem because the game has only one tool proficiency: it’s an unnecessary mechanic. Suggested fixes: * Remove the proficiency with thieves’ tools from rogues (a). Anyone with Disable device (not just rogues) uses them to disable traps or pick locks. This resolves the issues pertaining to the Rake (b), the Guild Thief (c), and Superior Skill training. It also means that one can conceive of a Disable device roll that does not necessarily benefit from a Rogue’s Skill mastery (h). * Remove the bonus to the roll granted by tools (g). This needlessly inflates the DC of every lock, and allows what amounts to a trivial non-magical object to meaningfully impact a skill roll. If nothing else, it sets a bad precedent. * Allow locks to be picked by anyone with Disable device, rather than anyone proficient with thieves’ tools (f). Any thoughts, as always, appreciated. In a world with Hedge Magicians and Mystic Healers, is there a reason to limit full use of the Disable Device skill to Rogues? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Disable Device and Thieves' Tools.
Top