Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Disappointed D&D Insider Customer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sunseeker" data-source="post: 5371081"><p>People don't "need" anything if you view everything in life as "wants". People don't need to eat and drink if they don't want to live. You don't need a boat if you don't want to go out into the ocean(nor swim, truly).</p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p>I disagree. If this was true, supermarkets would be nonexistance. Needs are much easier to build upon than wants. This is why Windows is so "popular" because most software needs it and most people need that software for their livelyhood.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Right, but for example, WotC isn't making money off Pathfinder. For the most part, Pathfinder replaces WotC, even though it uses the D20 system that WotC basically invented. Farmville requires Facebook to play, Pathfinder does not require WotC to play. Much like any open-source software, WotC is making itsself obsolete by allowing others to profit at their expense. </p><p> </p><p>I mean, we've all seen how many people here constantly say "I'm going to play Pathfinder over 4e because of XXXX, since the system is exactly the same." If WotC wants to keep it audience, then it needs to ensure that everyone who wants to play a D20 system is utilizing their system first. Microsoft doesn't care if you want to use a different typing program, but it makes it harder for you to NOT use theirs.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>There are an awful lot of value-judegements in this statement. Look at WoW, millions of players, yet they continue to gain more. Why? They certainly don't give everyone every little cookie they ask for, and they certainly don't remove every little feature people don't like. But in general, they make a good, core system, that REQUIRES people to both buy their product and subscribe to their service, and so 75% of the population is happy, which is good enough. WotC will never satisfy everyone, looking for a way to do so is impossible. heck, look at Windows, most people HATE windows, yet they keep selling product. Why? Because they have ensured that the market is skewed in their favor, any company that wants to succeed inevitably does this.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>That's bad for business. If a customer doesn't NEED a company, why should they buy their porduct? WotC has to do the heavy lifting because otherwise the customer wouldn't need them, and if they customer doesn't need them, WotC doesn't make money.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> I'm not familiar with it. </p><p>That said, a cycling "look at me!" article on the front page is always a great way to catch people's eye and it's not very hard to do. At the same time, they need to balance "look here's something interesting" and "while you're at it, you can find out more by buying XXX or our subscription."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sunseeker, post: 5371081"] People don't "need" anything if you view everything in life as "wants". People don't need to eat and drink if they don't want to live. You don't need a boat if you don't want to go out into the ocean(nor swim, truly). I disagree. If this was true, supermarkets would be nonexistance. Needs are much easier to build upon than wants. This is why Windows is so "popular" because most software needs it and most people need that software for their livelyhood. Right, but for example, WotC isn't making money off Pathfinder. For the most part, Pathfinder replaces WotC, even though it uses the D20 system that WotC basically invented. Farmville requires Facebook to play, Pathfinder does not require WotC to play. Much like any open-source software, WotC is making itsself obsolete by allowing others to profit at their expense. I mean, we've all seen how many people here constantly say "I'm going to play Pathfinder over 4e because of XXXX, since the system is exactly the same." If WotC wants to keep it audience, then it needs to ensure that everyone who wants to play a D20 system is utilizing their system first. Microsoft doesn't care if you want to use a different typing program, but it makes it harder for you to NOT use theirs. There are an awful lot of value-judegements in this statement. Look at WoW, millions of players, yet they continue to gain more. Why? They certainly don't give everyone every little cookie they ask for, and they certainly don't remove every little feature people don't like. But in general, they make a good, core system, that REQUIRES people to both buy their product and subscribe to their service, and so 75% of the population is happy, which is good enough. WotC will never satisfy everyone, looking for a way to do so is impossible. heck, look at Windows, most people HATE windows, yet they keep selling product. Why? Because they have ensured that the market is skewed in their favor, any company that wants to succeed inevitably does this. That's bad for business. If a customer doesn't NEED a company, why should they buy their porduct? WotC has to do the heavy lifting because otherwise the customer wouldn't need them, and if they customer doesn't need them, WotC doesn't make money. I'm not familiar with it. That said, a cycling "look at me!" article on the front page is always a great way to catch people's eye and it's not very hard to do. At the same time, they need to balance "look here's something interesting" and "while you're at it, you can find out more by buying XXX or our subscription." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Disappointed D&D Insider Customer
Top