Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 4532691" data-attributes="member: 48965">Uhm first...it's not your $30 on a MM that has monsters you've actually heard of.  Since your talking about MM4 it's your 34.95*4 or about $140 for your monsters you've heard of...this also totally ignores the fact that you are still getting a bunch of monsters you've never heard of as filler in each book anyway...so how is this "better" for the consumer than getting the monsters he wants in one book and choosing to add the new ones in based on if they appeal to him or not?  Your usefulness argument (for the consumer) fails big time.Second point is that...I don't think people view "a company that seeks to make money on gaming..." as inherently evil (but using hyperbole to stress your point is great on the internet.).  Instead, like consumers of any product they want the best deal, quality, and value for their money... this is just being smart.  The same way WotC chooses to do what they feel is intheir best interests.  I could see your argument having some validity if posters were claiming we should get the classic monsters for free...but that's not what's being said.  It's not about attacking a business for being a business... it's about voicing your opinions on how they choose to conduct business and the value they bring to you as a consumer.</blockquote>