Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="RFisher" data-source="post: 4532759" data-attributes="member: 3608">Yeah. I think this would’ve been a much better idea.It’ll be interesting to see.Of course, it is only natural for the core to sell better. But it isn’t due to perception, it’s due to the fact that people are either going to buy core only or core + supplement. Very few are going to buy only supplement. And one item will always have better sales than two items.If that makes any sense.To put it in simplistic terms, I think a lot of us who tend to only buy the core books do so because we only want three books. So, I think this strategy isn’t likely to improve the sales of the additional core books significantly.As I said, it’ll be interesting to see.Just because you don’t sell as many Companion sets as Basic sets does not mean the Companion set was a failure. It brought them sales they wouldn’t have had if they didn’t produce a Companion set at all.Would another model have improved overall sales? (A set for each class? (^_^)) Maybe. I suspect it wouldn’t have significantly.</blockquote>