Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 4543128" data-attributes="member: 18280"><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" />You did get a reply earlier.Of course, the word "must" is loaded.  So far as I know, no one holds a rifle to your head to force you to do so.  If you are comfortable with absurd results, and enjoy Monty Python & the Holy Grail as a game experience, I suppose that retconning the results wouldn't be desireable.Me, I can only take so many scenes of LAUNCELOT: Concorde! Brave, Concorde ... you shall not have died in vain! CONCORDE: I'm not quite dead, sir ... LAUNCELOT (a little deflated): Oh, well ... er brave Concorde! You shall not have been fatally wounded in vain! CONCORDE: I think I could pull through, sir. LAUNCELOT: Good Concorde ... stay here and rest awhile. He makes to leap off dramatically. CONCORDE: I think I'll be all right to come with you, sir. LAUNCELOT: I will send help, brave friend, as soon as I have accomplished this most daring, desperate adventure in this genre. CONCORDE: Really, I feel fine, sir. LAUNCELOT: Farewell, Concorde! CONCORDE: It just seems silly ... me lying here. SIR LAUNCELOT plunges off into the forest. before the game turns me off completely.  YMMV.In the thread where this was first brought up, many examples were given where, in order to gain non-absurd results, one had to either (1) avoid all narrative description of the results of combat, (2) retcon the narrative description of the results of combat, or (3) re-write the 4e rules pertaining to damage and healing.Go back and read that thread again if you want examples; they are still there.RC</blockquote>

Verification