Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 4545001" data-attributes="member: 18280">Ah.....but I was talking about Hulk Hogan really engaged in combat, not engaged in a coreographed combat simulation.  <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" />I actually think that "Second Wind" and "Inspiring Word" are not bad ideas.  RCFG has a "second wind" mechanic, after all, and a "shake it off" mechanic that blurs the distinction between "temporary" and "real" hit points.  I just think that they are not well realized in 4e.  They could be; lots of folks on EN World have suggested fixes that help these abilities considerably, IMHO.Nah.  Enjoying/not being bothered by absurd results isn't wrongbadfun.I was never bothered by the absurd results of 1e's falling damage rules.  That doesn't make my enjoying 1e at the time wrongbadfun, nor does it make the falling damage results a whit less absurd.BTW, though, as I am working on RCFG's definition of hit points, I have found this thread enormously useful in terms of refining that definition.......and I owe everyone here thanks for that.Thanks.RC</blockquote>