Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Disappointed with Minis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Djeta Thernadier" data-source="post: 1423828" data-attributes="member: 12043"><p>I actually think they are great. I just bought a case of Dragon eye for MojoGM and we sat on the floor and opened the 16 packs that came in the case. We got almost all of this series, with a few exceptions, which will be picked up online as singles, or we'll use older pewter minis for those creatures if need be. Right now, in our games, we don't just use the new minis. We use a mix and we never painted our pewters. Yeah, they look better painted, but neither of us has the time or talent to paint them. I also use a lot of pewter fantasy figurines that were not really meant to be D&D minis.</p><p></p><p>I don't see how 3.5 assumes the use of minis. I'm sure you could play without them if it's that much of a hassle for you; or you could always use the older ones and just not paint them if that's not your cup of tea.</p><p></p><p>You have to realize that there are just some creatures that minis would never , ever get made for due to lack of demand were it not for the randomized packs. Someday you might be glad you have some of them. You never know. </p><p></p><p>Another thing to consider is trading some of your commons in for a rare on one of the sites that sells singles. Some of the commons may seem boring to you & me , but to someone who wants and army of 40 or so of the commons of one type, and has no need for a rare that has nothing to do with their game setting; they might be more than willing to trade. </p><p></p><p>I don't know. I guess I kind of understand the complaints about the randomness, but I personally think it's kind of fun.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Djeta Thernadier, post: 1423828, member: 12043"] I actually think they are great. I just bought a case of Dragon eye for MojoGM and we sat on the floor and opened the 16 packs that came in the case. We got almost all of this series, with a few exceptions, which will be picked up online as singles, or we'll use older pewter minis for those creatures if need be. Right now, in our games, we don't just use the new minis. We use a mix and we never painted our pewters. Yeah, they look better painted, but neither of us has the time or talent to paint them. I also use a lot of pewter fantasy figurines that were not really meant to be D&D minis. I don't see how 3.5 assumes the use of minis. I'm sure you could play without them if it's that much of a hassle for you; or you could always use the older ones and just not paint them if that's not your cup of tea. You have to realize that there are just some creatures that minis would never , ever get made for due to lack of demand were it not for the randomized packs. Someday you might be glad you have some of them. You never know. Another thing to consider is trading some of your commons in for a rare on one of the sites that sells singles. Some of the commons may seem boring to you & me , but to someone who wants and army of 40 or so of the commons of one type, and has no need for a rare that has nothing to do with their game setting; they might be more than willing to trade. I don't know. I guess I kind of understand the complaints about the randomness, but I personally think it's kind of fun. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Disappointed with Minis
Top