Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 6891048" data-attributes="member: 12731">RulesJD, yes, you're right in that Battlemaster Maneuvers are just as limited a resource as spells.But that is Kalani's point! Her answer was directed at a wish for something significantly different - the DMG's disarm option. As something 1) every character can do and 2) they can do it every round, all day longit would have a profound impact on weapon-using monsters ability to perform as expected.I don't think Kalani meant &quot;The Battlemaster is the ONLY way to ever separate a monster from his weapon&quot;, only that &quot;The Battlemaster is the only AL-legal way to access an approximation of the DMG Disarm variant&quot;.At least I know that's what I meant when I wrote it... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />The last sentence was a reference to how individual DMs could (and still can) allow it on a ad-hoc basis. It wasn't meant to be read as &quot;no other AL-legal character build, such as spellcasters&quot;.Best regards,</blockquote>

[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 6891048, member: 12731"] RulesJD, yes, you're right in that Battlemaster Maneuvers are just as limited a resource as spells. But that is Kalani's point! Her answer was directed at a wish for something significantly different - the DMG's disarm option. As something 1) every character can do and 2) they can do it every round, all day long it would have a profound impact on weapon-using monsters ability to perform as expected. I don't think Kalani meant "The Battlemaster is the ONLY way to ever separate a monster from his weapon", only that "The Battlemaster is the only AL-legal way to access an approximation of the DMG Disarm variant". At least I know that's what I meant when I wrote it... :) The last sentence was a reference to how individual DMs could (and still can) allow it on a ad-hoc basis. It wasn't meant to be read as "no other AL-legal character build, such as spellcasters". Best regards, [/QUOTE]

Verification