Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Discontinuity: 3e and D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dark Jezter" data-source="post: 2137109" data-attributes="member: 1015"><p><strong>Discontinuity: Hamburger and Whopper</strong></p><p></p><p>In a recent thread on how to introduce the Whopper to a person familiar only with the traditional hamburger, many posters recommended that it would be best to advise this person to approach the Whopper as an entirely new type of food. This struck me as eminently sensible advice. Yet, much to my surprise, many people were upset by this sage counsel -- they thought that it implied that the Whopper was 'not a hamburger'. </p><p></p><p>Leaving aside the fact that this perceived 'insult' was nonexistent, I think that this advice was entirely correct -- the Whopper is a fundamentally different meal from any pre-whopper version of the hamburger (including the deluxe hamburger, the cheeseburger, the bacon cheeseburger, the Big Mac, the quarter pounder, the double quarter pounder, etc). Indeed, the sesame seed bun system of the Whopper appears to have been lifted wholesale from the Big Mac (replace the in-between bun with mayo and you have a Whopper), and IME eating a Whopper has a lot more in common with eating a Big Mac than a regular hamburger. </p><p></p><p>That quibble aside, the red ripe tomatoes, crisp lettuce, creamy mayonnaise, ketchup, crunchy pickles, etc., all manifestly demonstrate radical breaks from earlier versions of the hamburger. </p><p></p><p>In short, I think it is entirely appropriate -- and, more importantly, intellectually honest -- to point out that the Whopper is a fundamentally different type of food from the traditional hamburger. It is a different meal -- plain and simple. This is not necessarily a bad thing -- obviously lots of people (including most people who post here) prefer the Whopper over earlier versions of the hamburger. But to suggest otherwise is simply incorrect.</p><p></p><p>(And don't give me any of that "the Whopper still has a ground beef patty..." rubbish. So did/do a lot of other sandwiches!) </p><p></p><p>This is the truth. Accept it. </p><p></p><p>(Finally, this is not an 'sandwich war' claim. I happen to like regular hamburger more than the Whopper, but I would take the Whopper over a Big Mac any day... My point is an empirical one, not a normative one.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dark Jezter, post: 2137109, member: 1015"] [b]Discontinuity: Hamburger and Whopper[/b] In a recent thread on how to introduce the Whopper to a person familiar only with the traditional hamburger, many posters recommended that it would be best to advise this person to approach the Whopper as an entirely new type of food. This struck me as eminently sensible advice. Yet, much to my surprise, many people were upset by this sage counsel -- they thought that it implied that the Whopper was 'not a hamburger'. Leaving aside the fact that this perceived 'insult' was nonexistent, I think that this advice was entirely correct -- the Whopper is a fundamentally different meal from any pre-whopper version of the hamburger (including the deluxe hamburger, the cheeseburger, the bacon cheeseburger, the Big Mac, the quarter pounder, the double quarter pounder, etc). Indeed, the sesame seed bun system of the Whopper appears to have been lifted wholesale from the Big Mac (replace the in-between bun with mayo and you have a Whopper), and IME eating a Whopper has a lot more in common with eating a Big Mac than a regular hamburger. That quibble aside, the red ripe tomatoes, crisp lettuce, creamy mayonnaise, ketchup, crunchy pickles, etc., all manifestly demonstrate radical breaks from earlier versions of the hamburger. In short, I think it is entirely appropriate -- and, more importantly, intellectually honest -- to point out that the Whopper is a fundamentally different type of food from the traditional hamburger. It is a different meal -- plain and simple. This is not necessarily a bad thing -- obviously lots of people (including most people who post here) prefer the Whopper over earlier versions of the hamburger. But to suggest otherwise is simply incorrect. (And don't give me any of that "the Whopper still has a ground beef patty..." rubbish. So did/do a lot of other sandwiches!) This is the truth. Accept it. (Finally, this is not an 'sandwich war' claim. I happen to like regular hamburger more than the Whopper, but I would take the Whopper over a Big Mac any day... My point is an empirical one, not a normative one.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Discontinuity: 3e and D&D
Top