Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="fanboy2000" data-source="post: 2138199" data-attributes="member: 19998">The name game is so much fun to play. It's like counting D&amp;D editions. The question &quot;how do you count to 3 in D&amp;D?&quot; is always fun. There should be a drinking game about it.The bit about Thesues' ship reminds me of a joke:What's most interesting to me, is that if WotC had done things like call the new system d20, OGL the system, and published a game called d20 Modern, you wouldn't have antother name to call it. Acording to the Sapir-Worf Hypothesis linguistic determinism sugests that you wouldn't have made the argument if WotC hadn't provided you with the terminology for it. For what it's worth, I wouldn't call D&amp;D 3e d20 Fantasy, because it isn't flexable in the same way that it's implied counter part, d20 Modern is. I'd call it d20 Greyhawk, that's name is closer to the core book's presentation of the rules.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="fanboy2000, post: 2138199, member: 19998"] The name game is so much fun to play. It's like counting D&D editions. The question "how do you count to 3 in D&D?" is always fun. There should be a drinking game about it. The bit about Thesues' ship reminds me of a joke: What's most interesting to me, is that if WotC had done things like call the new system d20, OGL the system, and published a game called d20 Modern, you wouldn't [i]have antother name to call it.[/i] Acording to the Sapir-Worf Hypothesis linguistic determinism sugests that you wouldn't have made the argument if WotC hadn't provided you with the terminology for it. For what it's worth, I wouldn't call D&D 3e d20 Fantasy, because it isn't flexable in the same way that it's implied counter part, d20 Modern is. I'd call it d20 Greyhawk, that's name is closer to the core book's presentation of the rules. [/QUOTE]

Verification