Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Discussing Worldbuilding: Why Don't The Mages Take Over The World?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8780582" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>But not all spellcasting does take this focus and training. Sorcerers for example don't need it. </p><p></p><p>Also, many nobility were also knights (not all of them, but all knights were nobility) and it is no more difficult to train to be a Cavalier than it is to train to be an Eldritch Knight, so why wouldn't they chose to learn magic?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why did the people follow the Pharaoh? Because he was the Son of Horus, Divinely appointed by the Gods to rule. </p><p></p><p>Why did people follow the King of England? Because he was ordained by God to rule the land. </p><p></p><p>Why did people follow the Emperor of China? Because he held the Mandate of Heaven and had the approval of the Celestial Court to Rule. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I think you are far over-stating the idea that people would not be happy with the idea that their King was a cleric who served a God. In fact, being a servant of God is kind of a pre-requisite to rulership in many, many places and times. </p><p></p><p>Also, again, NOTHING about a warlock pact requires servitude. It requires a contract. What is the difference between the King making a contract with the Lord of the Forest for magical blessings upon his family and the land, in exhange for deliveries of sweet honey and a yearly festival, and the King making a contract with the King of the Dwarves for high-quality steel and dwarven weapons in exchange for gold and mutual aid in the case of an assault from the Goblin Empire? Kings make these sorts of contracts ALL THE TIME.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But I think you are hitting the nail on the head for exactly why survival of the fittest would push a magical world to being ruled by magical people. Because entrenched power tends to preserve itself. </p><p></p><p>A family dynasty built on being fine warriors who are good at fighting can get you land and soldiers. But that can also happen with a family dynasty built on the ability to use magic. Especially since magic can create wealth, and even if the first son doesn't study magic because he is too busy studying courtly intrigue, the third son can be making magical artifacts that increase the family wealth. And if he's making all the money, then there is every reason he could end up taking over the family, because he's the one who is the lynch pin.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8780582, member: 6801228"] But not all spellcasting does take this focus and training. Sorcerers for example don't need it. Also, many nobility were also knights (not all of them, but all knights were nobility) and it is no more difficult to train to be a Cavalier than it is to train to be an Eldritch Knight, so why wouldn't they chose to learn magic? Why did the people follow the Pharaoh? Because he was the Son of Horus, Divinely appointed by the Gods to rule. Why did people follow the King of England? Because he was ordained by God to rule the land. Why did people follow the Emperor of China? Because he held the Mandate of Heaven and had the approval of the Celestial Court to Rule. I think you are far over-stating the idea that people would not be happy with the idea that their King was a cleric who served a God. In fact, being a servant of God is kind of a pre-requisite to rulership in many, many places and times. Also, again, NOTHING about a warlock pact requires servitude. It requires a contract. What is the difference between the King making a contract with the Lord of the Forest for magical blessings upon his family and the land, in exhange for deliveries of sweet honey and a yearly festival, and the King making a contract with the King of the Dwarves for high-quality steel and dwarven weapons in exchange for gold and mutual aid in the case of an assault from the Goblin Empire? Kings make these sorts of contracts ALL THE TIME. But I think you are hitting the nail on the head for exactly why survival of the fittest would push a magical world to being ruled by magical people. Because entrenched power tends to preserve itself. A family dynasty built on being fine warriors who are good at fighting can get you land and soldiers. But that can also happen with a family dynasty built on the ability to use magic. Especially since magic can create wealth, and even if the first son doesn't study magic because he is too busy studying courtly intrigue, the third son can be making magical artifacts that increase the family wealth. And if he's making all the money, then there is every reason he could end up taking over the family, because he's the one who is the lynch pin. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Discussing Worldbuilding: Why Don't The Mages Take Over The World?
Top