Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Discussion - LEW 4th Edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Graf" data-source="post: 4393155" data-attributes="member: 3087"><p>Cool. Sorry if I overreacted.<img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/blush.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":blush:" title="Blush :blush:" data-shortname=":blush:" /></p><p></p><p>I wanted to pull this out of the (most excellent) <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/../wiki/index.php?title=Talk:The_Transitive_Isles&action=edit" target="_blank">discussion page</a> covaithe created.</p><p></p><p>I like it. We'd need to finesse it a bit to explain why the five didn't do something about it. But that would provide a great counterpoint to the tolerance of the main island.</p><p>Alternatively it could be a sort of dark mirror image. The main island gets a lot of wealth from the piracy trade, but they pretend they don't. So there could be friction and intrigue.</p><p></p><p>Generally speaking I see no reason not to create lots of isles (if people want to). And poll it out in some fashion. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Fantastic. I'm sure its still missing a lot, but it was an honest effort to move a step closer to our ultimate goal.</p><p></p><p></p><p>No you made your check. The point of having it on the wiki is that people can just change it.</p><p>So if you want to add a question? Just add it. </p><p>Is my wording lame? Change it.</p><p></p><p>I -wanted- to do a <strong>non-binding poll</strong>, after getting feedback. Something specific to show people and get a reaction. If people like the fluff and get excited? Great.</p><p>If they hate the fluff? Hopefully they get annoyed and come write something.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Doing it on the wiki is better I think. It's easier to go to one place and see people's comments.</p><p>If you're responding to people you can preface your comments with a : (or several :<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> to make a nested conversation. (it makes the text bigger... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite5" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":confused:" /> and I have no idea why. It doesn't do that on wikipedia does it?)</p><p>The problem with doing it in a thread is that the last person really winds up with primacy and you usually forget stuff from more than a page or so back. (at least I do)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Something like that works for me <em>main island</em> is deliberately undefined.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Graf, post: 4393155, member: 3087"] Cool. Sorry if I overreacted.:blush: I wanted to pull this out of the (most excellent) [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/../wiki/index.php?title=Talk:The_Transitive_Isles&action=edit"]discussion page[/URL] covaithe created. I like it. We'd need to finesse it a bit to explain why the five didn't do something about it. But that would provide a great counterpoint to the tolerance of the main island. Alternatively it could be a sort of dark mirror image. The main island gets a lot of wealth from the piracy trade, but they pretend they don't. So there could be friction and intrigue. Generally speaking I see no reason not to create lots of isles (if people want to). And poll it out in some fashion. Fantastic. I'm sure its still missing a lot, but it was an honest effort to move a step closer to our ultimate goal. No you made your check. The point of having it on the wiki is that people can just change it. So if you want to add a question? Just add it. Is my wording lame? Change it. I -wanted- to do a [B]non-binding poll[/B], after getting feedback. Something specific to show people and get a reaction. If people like the fluff and get excited? Great. If they hate the fluff? Hopefully they get annoyed and come write something. Doing it on the wiki is better I think. It's easier to go to one place and see people's comments. If you're responding to people you can preface your comments with a : (or several ::) to make a nested conversation. (it makes the text bigger... :confused: and I have no idea why. It doesn't do that on wikipedia does it?) The problem with doing it in a thread is that the last person really winds up with primacy and you usually forget stuff from more than a page or so back. (at least I do) Something like that works for me [I]main island[/I] is deliberately undefined. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Discussion - LEW 4th Edition
Top