Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Disintegrate Vs. Druid
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaculata" data-source="post: 6735418" data-attributes="member: 6801286"><p>This is how I feel about it as well. The outcome of Wild Shape versus Disintegrate is unclear, but would you want your character to be permanently destroyed because your DM leaned one way, instead of the other? That seems like a very lame way to go.</p><p></p><p>And lets not forget that the changing-back-rule exists to give Druids some tanking capability. It is supposed to act like a shield, so that the HP you lose while in beast form is not your only health pool. By ruling in favor of disintegrate, you undermine a core game rule of the class.</p><p></p><p>I understand that disintegrate is a special spell. Its ability to reduce creatures to dust is one of the crucial details that makes it different from an ordinary damage spell. But that aspect is based purely on damage, and this Druid ability is intended to soak up damage. If you want a ruling that is more in the middle, do the following:</p><p></p><p><em>The animal form is reduced to ashes. The druid returns to his human form, at the hit points he had before changing into animal form, and any remaining damage from the spell spills over.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Optional:</strong> All the items that melted into the form are reduced to dust as well.</p><p><strong>Optional:</strong> The Druid can possibly no longer shape shift into this animal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaculata, post: 6735418, member: 6801286"] This is how I feel about it as well. The outcome of Wild Shape versus Disintegrate is unclear, but would you want your character to be permanently destroyed because your DM leaned one way, instead of the other? That seems like a very lame way to go. And lets not forget that the changing-back-rule exists to give Druids some tanking capability. It is supposed to act like a shield, so that the HP you lose while in beast form is not your only health pool. By ruling in favor of disintegrate, you undermine a core game rule of the class. I understand that disintegrate is a special spell. Its ability to reduce creatures to dust is one of the crucial details that makes it different from an ordinary damage spell. But that aspect is based purely on damage, and this Druid ability is intended to soak up damage. If you want a ruling that is more in the middle, do the following: [I]The animal form is reduced to ashes. The druid returns to his human form, at the hit points he had before changing into animal form, and any remaining damage from the spell spills over.[/I] [B]Optional:[/B] All the items that melted into the form are reduced to dust as well. [B]Optional:[/B] The Druid can possibly no longer shape shift into this animal. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Disintegrate Vs. Druid
Top