Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Disintegrate Vs. Druid
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arial Black" data-source="post: 6747020" data-attributes="member: 6799649"><p>The damage done by an attack is a single amount. There is no suggestion that it is applied in single hp increments.</p><p></p><p>Your arguments here remind me of the time when you, under your 'Orethalion' username, got me to stop contributing to the WotC threads. Remember when your argument was that the <em>effects</em> of a spell appear <em>before</em> the spellcasting (VSM components) has even been completed, just to try and justify your idea that you can cast <em>some</em> of an 'instantaneous' spell, see what happens, and then decide who to target with the rest of the same instantaneous spell? When you challenged the rest of us to prove you wrong, I realized that you'd gone through the looking glass and I wasn't going to follow.</p><p></p><p>Here, you're choosing to change the way damage is resolved, just so that you can willfully misinterpret the rules so that you can say that they say something that you know that they don't: in that case 'how instantaneous spells work', in this case 'how damage is applied'.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In this case it does, because 'this damage', whether it is from a spell or a sword stroke, is a single amount. A sword stroke doing 12 damage doesn't hit you 12 times, and a <em>disintegrate</em> doing 80 damage isn't 80 spells with a dust check after each one.</p><p></p><p>If 'this damage' is 80 points, then 23 points is not 'this damage'. The spell does 80 damage, 80 damage causes the beast form to lose all of its 23 hp and the reverted druid to lose 57. If you don't apply that 57, then you haven't applied 'this damage' because that 57 is the damage done by that spell just as surely as the other 23.</p><p></p><p>You think that you are allowed to just do 23 and ignore the other 57, and require us to prove you wrong? Okay, I'll choose to take, say, 1 point and ignore the rest. Prove me wrong! Show me, in the rules, exactly where it says I'm not allowed to do that!</p><p></p><p>The burden of proof lies with those who are claiming things the rules don't say. They don't say that you can choose not to apply all the damage.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It might not be the best analogy, but loan sharks care about getting their money, not about the adventures you had in order to get their money.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arial Black, post: 6747020, member: 6799649"] The damage done by an attack is a single amount. There is no suggestion that it is applied in single hp increments. Your arguments here remind me of the time when you, under your 'Orethalion' username, got me to stop contributing to the WotC threads. Remember when your argument was that the [I]effects[/I] of a spell appear [I]before[/I] the spellcasting (VSM components) has even been completed, just to try and justify your idea that you can cast [I]some[/I] of an 'instantaneous' spell, see what happens, and then decide who to target with the rest of the same instantaneous spell? When you challenged the rest of us to prove you wrong, I realized that you'd gone through the looking glass and I wasn't going to follow. Here, you're choosing to change the way damage is resolved, just so that you can willfully misinterpret the rules so that you can say that they say something that you know that they don't: in that case 'how instantaneous spells work', in this case 'how damage is applied'. In this case it does, because 'this damage', whether it is from a spell or a sword stroke, is a single amount. A sword stroke doing 12 damage doesn't hit you 12 times, and a [I]disintegrate[/I] doing 80 damage isn't 80 spells with a dust check after each one. If 'this damage' is 80 points, then 23 points is not 'this damage'. The spell does 80 damage, 80 damage causes the beast form to lose all of its 23 hp and the reverted druid to lose 57. If you don't apply that 57, then you haven't applied 'this damage' because that 57 is the damage done by that spell just as surely as the other 23. You think that you are allowed to just do 23 and ignore the other 57, and require us to prove you wrong? Okay, I'll choose to take, say, 1 point and ignore the rest. Prove me wrong! Show me, in the rules, exactly where it says I'm not allowed to do that! The burden of proof lies with those who are claiming things the rules don't say. They don't say that you can choose not to apply all the damage. It might not be the best analogy, but loan sharks care about getting their money, not about the adventures you had in order to get their money. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Disintegrate Vs. Druid
Top