Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="seebs" data-source="post: 6749797" data-attributes="member: 61529">In the absence of the post specifically asserting that the devs intended wild shape to trump distintegrate, my interpretation of the intent would have been the other way. Disintegrate says "if the target is reduced to zero", not "if the target remains at zero", and I would have assumed that was the intent. So, no, the intent is not "perfectly clear". It is possible for a reasonably fluent user of the language to read the things and derive a different conclusion about intent.That's because there's no actual statement about the interactions, so all we have is two rules which say different things about "zero hit points", and no way to tell which one is supposed to win.</blockquote>