Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Violent Solace" data-source="post: 7361823" data-attributes="member: 6943108">Ok I've been reading this thread for too long to not throw in my thoughts and i have to say its pretty <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />ing solid but you wont like it ehem, The druid does NOT get dusted (unfortunately) i looked it over as objectively as possible and can say that RAW supports this (again unfortunately) as follows as the spell works:&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Did it hit resolve,&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; If so do damage resolve&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Is the target at zero If so dustHowever the druid reverts back to humanoid for during the phase in wich thay take damage this is evident in two things&nbsp;one the damage from wild shape carries over to the druids original form&nbsp; two the druid is not effected by the standard effect of droping to zero ie falling unconscious and death saving throwsTherefore RAW does support that the effects of dropping to zero hp happens after wild shape revolves as much as i enjoy the idea of the druid being dusted ther is no evidence that contradicts what i have stated in raw Therfore IS RAW though the rules of either do not specifically state in text wich comes first but this is the only logical resolution to the data in the book and therfore in the book&nbsp; *Besides the RAI is more important because text without an intention is text without purpose and a rulebook without a purpose is not a rule book Feel free to be stubborn and tell me im wrong without even considering my logic but i will not bother with half baked rebuttals with no valid reasoning behind them if you are going to try to change my mind it will have to be good* this does not mean that you have to rule it this way every dm is intitled to runing their gam how they see fit</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Violent Solace, post: 7361823, member: 6943108"] Ok I've been reading this thread for too long to not throw in my thoughts and i have to say its pretty :):):):)ing solid but you wont like it ehem, The druid does NOT get dusted (unfortunately) i looked it over as objectively as possible and can say that RAW supports this (again unfortunately) as follows as the spell works: Did it hit resolve, If so do damage resolve Is the target at zero If so dust However the druid reverts back to humanoid for during the phase in wich thay take damage this is evident in two things one the damage from wild shape carries over to the druids original form two the druid is not effected by the standard effect of droping to zero ie falling unconscious and death saving throws Therefore RAW does support that the effects of dropping to zero hp happens after wild shape revolves as much as i enjoy the idea of the druid being dusted ther is no evidence that contradicts what i have stated in raw Therfore IS RAW though the rules of either do not specifically state in text wich comes first but this is the only logical resolution to the data in the book and therfore in the book * Besides the RAI is more important because text without an intention is text without purpose and a rulebook without a purpose is not a rule book Feel free to be stubborn and tell me im wrong without even considering my logic but i will not bother with half baked rebuttals with no valid reasoning behind them if you are going to try to change my mind it will have to be good * this does not mean that you have to rule it this way every dm is intitled to runing their gam how they see fit [/QUOTE]

Verification