Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Disney sues Midjourney
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blue" data-source="post: 9696261" data-attributes="member: 20564"><p>Let me restate this. If there are zero legal repercussions for those collecting copyrighted material, there is no deterrent on those collecting copyrighted material to make sure the models they train on that material aren't misused. And by misused, I mean used outside the boundaries of Fair Use.</p><p></p><p>Does it make sense now?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Which is why I didn't refer to it as copyright but as counterfeiting. And if it's close enough that it's considered a derivative work there are other legal issue.</p><p></p><p>Again, please refer to the real world issue with Studio Ghibli a few months back, that while there currently legal systems have not caught up to AI for widespread style copying, that doesn't mean this isn't something that moving forward shouldn't be protected. The law often lags behind activities-that-should-be-crimes made possible by technology.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, the end user doesn't have the training material and can produce copyrighted material without knowing it. The enforcement cannot be on that side, or cannot be solely on that side. There must be provisions in place that if material is collected for Fair Use, it is ONLY used for Fair Use. And that means deterrent needs to affect the collector.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm going to assume that since you suggested and are defending it, that you understand what fair use is. Let me remind others:</p><p></p><p>Fair use is a legal doctrine that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder, primarily for purposes like criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.</p><p></p><p>Can you explain how you see that 'a lot of the duplication' is for the purpose of 'criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research'?</p><p></p><p>Because I don't see that, especially among generative AI used for art.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blue, post: 9696261, member: 20564"] Let me restate this. If there are zero legal repercussions for those collecting copyrighted material, there is no deterrent on those collecting copyrighted material to make sure the models they train on that material aren't misused. And by misused, I mean used outside the boundaries of Fair Use. Does it make sense now? Which is why I didn't refer to it as copyright but as counterfeiting. And if it's close enough that it's considered a derivative work there are other legal issue. Again, please refer to the real world issue with Studio Ghibli a few months back, that while there currently legal systems have not caught up to AI for widespread style copying, that doesn't mean this isn't something that moving forward shouldn't be protected. The law often lags behind activities-that-should-be-crimes made possible by technology. Again, the end user doesn't have the training material and can produce copyrighted material without knowing it. The enforcement cannot be on that side, or cannot be solely on that side. There must be provisions in place that if material is collected for Fair Use, it is ONLY used for Fair Use. And that means deterrent needs to affect the collector. I'm going to assume that since you suggested and are defending it, that you understand what fair use is. Let me remind others: Fair use is a legal doctrine that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder, primarily for purposes like criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Can you explain how you see that 'a lot of the duplication' is for the purpose of 'criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research'? Because I don't see that, especially among generative AI used for art. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Disney sues Midjourney
Top