Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dispelling the FLY Spell vs Dispelling the Wings of Flying
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cptg1481" data-source="post: 1005948" data-attributes="member: 5360"><p><strong>Official Word?</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Anubis - While I respect your right to opine, as a mater of fact I thank you for yours, I have to say to make the statement above as if it is undisputable fact is a little presumptuous don't you think?</p><p></p><p>I would be curious from where and how you got the "official word". Is it errata, or discussion that is located not in the public forum or is it on/in an “official” publication/location. </p><p></p><p>If it is opinion or a conclusion drawn by you or someone else from other sources then I’d be very interested in the text and or logic that you (or anyone else) used to base the “official word” upon. If it is not “official” then I don’t think it is cool to sate so in a post. </p><p></p><p>Discussion of your post…</p><p></p><p>1. IMO I don't get that the "Wings of Flying effect you specifically as through a Fly spell" from the description of the item. The description (see my post above) from the SRD says that they “empower the wearer to fly as with a fly spell anywhere wide enough to accommodate the wingspan”. In my game, the words “as with” are not synonymous with “specifically as through a Fly spell”, especially when the item description infers that the “wings” are required for flight. Furthermore, the phrase “…and empower the wearer to fly as with a fly spell anywhere wide enough to accommodate the wingspan…”, can not mean "specifically as through a Fly spell” beacuse the “fly” spell does not specifically base its locomotion upon anything physical be it wings, arms or otherwise. The wings provide the lift, propulsion and maneuverability of the Wings of Flying. </p><p></p><p>2. The Wings of Flying are do not cast the spell fly or create its effect, it is a cloak that when the command word is spoken becomes a large set of wings that “empower the wearer to fly as with a fly spell anywhere wide enough to accommodate the wingspan”. You are free to “interpret” this however you wish for your game but for mine this means that the wings and the action of them flapping are both required for flight. If the item created the effects of the “fly” spell (see prior posts) “specifically” as you state is the “official word” then I think that like with the spell the wings would not be necessary. </p><p></p><p>3. As for the rest of your “official word” in view of the above it is suspect at best. Since the item in question does not create the “effects” of the spell and the item itself provides the gift of flight via a set of large wings it is clearly an item, in both of it's two forms - a cloak or a set of wings. In one it allows the wearer to fly in the other its does not. So as an item it can only be suppressed since there is no effect to dispel. The Dispel spell description also appears above in prior posts. </p><p></p><p>Again, I am very curious where the “official word” can be found and read as you describe it above. Please post it for us all to see. </p><p></p><p>Anubis: </p><p></p><p>OK now Im confused....you must have found more of the "offical word" while I was typing....</p><p></p><p>EDITED: </p><p></p><p>Does the new quote (immideately above) mean that the "official word" has changed since your first post? </p><p></p><p>Does this mean that when a character’s Wings of Flying are “dispelled” with a targeted dispel that he/she drops out of the sky like a rock like I stated above? Just wondering…..</p><p></p><p> </p><p>Thanks,</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cptg1481, post: 1005948, member: 5360"] [b]Official Word?[/b] Anubis - While I respect your right to opine, as a mater of fact I thank you for yours, I have to say to make the statement above as if it is undisputable fact is a little presumptuous don't you think? I would be curious from where and how you got the "official word". Is it errata, or discussion that is located not in the public forum or is it on/in an “official” publication/location. If it is opinion or a conclusion drawn by you or someone else from other sources then I’d be very interested in the text and or logic that you (or anyone else) used to base the “official word” upon. If it is not “official” then I don’t think it is cool to sate so in a post. Discussion of your post… 1. IMO I don't get that the "Wings of Flying effect you specifically as through a Fly spell" from the description of the item. The description (see my post above) from the SRD says that they “empower the wearer to fly as with a fly spell anywhere wide enough to accommodate the wingspan”. In my game, the words “as with” are not synonymous with “specifically as through a Fly spell”, especially when the item description infers that the “wings” are required for flight. Furthermore, the phrase “…and empower the wearer to fly as with a fly spell anywhere wide enough to accommodate the wingspan…”, can not mean "specifically as through a Fly spell” beacuse the “fly” spell does not specifically base its locomotion upon anything physical be it wings, arms or otherwise. The wings provide the lift, propulsion and maneuverability of the Wings of Flying. 2. The Wings of Flying are do not cast the spell fly or create its effect, it is a cloak that when the command word is spoken becomes a large set of wings that “empower the wearer to fly as with a fly spell anywhere wide enough to accommodate the wingspan”. You are free to “interpret” this however you wish for your game but for mine this means that the wings and the action of them flapping are both required for flight. If the item created the effects of the “fly” spell (see prior posts) “specifically” as you state is the “official word” then I think that like with the spell the wings would not be necessary. 3. As for the rest of your “official word” in view of the above it is suspect at best. Since the item in question does not create the “effects” of the spell and the item itself provides the gift of flight via a set of large wings it is clearly an item, in both of it's two forms - a cloak or a set of wings. In one it allows the wearer to fly in the other its does not. So as an item it can only be suppressed since there is no effect to dispel. The Dispel spell description also appears above in prior posts. Again, I am very curious where the “official word” can be found and read as you describe it above. Please post it for us all to see. Anubis: OK now Im confused....you must have found more of the "offical word" while I was typing.... EDITED: Does the new quote (immideately above) mean that the "official word" has changed since your first post? Does this mean that when a character’s Wings of Flying are “dispelled” with a targeted dispel that he/she drops out of the sky like a rock like I stated above? Just wondering….. Thanks, [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dispelling the FLY Spell vs Dispelling the Wings of Flying
Top