Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Michael Morris" data-source="post: 4366103" data-attributes="member: 87">I have an idea...Ok, got it. What's going on is the articles out of sequence have bad date inputs on their publish up and publish end setups. There's actually 6 entry points for this - Leader start/end, Feature start/end, Normal start/end.&nbsp; There really only needs to be one start date entry, then a point where it demotes from leader to feature, and feature to normal.&nbsp; I managed to confuse myself on this.What was confusing everyone is the placement of the article order is determined by the date given for the group it's in.&nbsp; If I scheduled an article to show as leader from the 26th to the 30th, Then as a feature from the 1st to the 7th it will sort among the features as if it where first posted on the 1st even though the date shown is the 26th.&nbsp; The problem is worse among the normal articles.The problem can be corrected for the interim by the newshounds, including myself, getting used to how the computer parses the dates for start and finish of articles.&nbsp; Long term though I need to correct the submissions interface which is far buggier than the display interface.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Michael Morris, post: 4366103, member: 87"] I have an idea... Ok, got it. What's going on is the articles out of sequence have bad date inputs on their publish up and publish end setups. There's actually 6 entry points for this - Leader start/end, Feature start/end, Normal start/end. There really only needs to be one start date entry, then a point where it demotes from leader to feature, and feature to normal. I managed to confuse myself on this. What was confusing everyone is the placement of the article order is determined by the date given for the group it's in. If I scheduled an article to show as leader from the 26th to the 30th, Then as a feature from the 1st to the 7th it will sort among the features as if it where first posted on the 1st even though the date shown is the 26th. The problem is worse among the normal articles. The problem can be corrected for the interim by the newshounds, including myself, getting used to how the computer parses the dates for start and finish of articles. Long term though I need to correct the submissions interface which is far buggier than the display interface. [/QUOTE]

Verification