Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Dissociating what I (we?) like from the mechanics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aldarc" data-source="post: 8624715" data-attributes="member: 5142"><p>Depends. In the case of 4e, I think that it works, though I'm not sure if I would have stretched it across 30 levels. There may have been alternative ways to achieve similar results but without as much need to design for 30 levels of player-facing content. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Check. I just wish that they got the math right the first time around and could actually design adventures around that visible design that they made for themselves. </p><p></p><p></p><p>This is a big one for me. 4e not only delivered in clear class roles but also in providing clear class themes (for the most part*). </p><p></p><p>* I'm still scratching my head about "the Seeker." It was a ranged primal striker, which was fine, but the name and archetype fantasy seemed murky when compared to its primal peers: i.e., Barbarian, Druid, Shaman, and Warden. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed, but see my earlier point about doing this across 30 levels. D&D 4e arguably could have created four tiers of play across 20 levels instead of three tiers of play across 30 levels. </p><p></p><p></p><p>There were some questionable balance decisions, and I think part of the issue stemmed from having to design material for every level. It may have been easier to Balance with less moving parts. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Check. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Check on all three. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Amen. Rolls against defenses are far more intuitive, IMHO, than saving throws. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Check. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Check. Compared to many other settings before it, the Nentir Vale was easier to wade through as a player and GM because there was less lore clutter. Its barebones nature made it easy to customize for GMs and to plug-n-play characters for players, because its setting themes were more important than the nitty-gritty lore. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Check. Moreover, the cosmology is built around broad themes that were easy to understand. This also meant it was fairly easy to understand the cosmic role of a new monster in a way that amounts to more than its alignment. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Check, though for me, I think the bigger point is how 4e set clear expectations surrounding the three tiers of play (i.e., Heroic, Paragon, and Epic) and the sort of threats that tonally the PCs should be facing. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Check.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aldarc, post: 8624715, member: 5142"] Depends. In the case of 4e, I think that it works, though I'm not sure if I would have stretched it across 30 levels. There may have been alternative ways to achieve similar results but without as much need to design for 30 levels of player-facing content. Check. I just wish that they got the math right the first time around and could actually design adventures around that visible design that they made for themselves. This is a big one for me. 4e not only delivered in clear class roles but also in providing clear class themes (for the most part*). * I'm still scratching my head about "the Seeker." It was a ranged primal striker, which was fine, but the name and archetype fantasy seemed murky when compared to its primal peers: i.e., Barbarian, Druid, Shaman, and Warden. Agreed, but see my earlier point about doing this across 30 levels. D&D 4e arguably could have created four tiers of play across 20 levels instead of three tiers of play across 30 levels. There were some questionable balance decisions, and I think part of the issue stemmed from having to design material for every level. It may have been easier to Balance with less moving parts. Check. Check on all three. Amen. Rolls against defenses are far more intuitive, IMHO, than saving throws. Agreed. Check. Check. Compared to many other settings before it, the Nentir Vale was easier to wade through as a player and GM because there was less lore clutter. Its barebones nature made it easy to customize for GMs and to plug-n-play characters for players, because its setting themes were more important than the nitty-gritty lore. Check. Moreover, the cosmology is built around broad themes that were easy to understand. This also meant it was fairly easy to understand the cosmic role of a new monster in a way that amounts to more than its alignment. Check, though for me, I think the bigger point is how 4e set clear expectations surrounding the three tiers of play (i.e., Heroic, Paragon, and Epic) and the sort of threats that tonally the PCs should be facing. Check. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Dissociating what I (we?) like from the mechanics
Top