Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Oofta" data-source="post: 7354291" data-attributes="member: 6801845">Reasonable people can, and do disagree all the time*.&nbsp; While I would disagree with someone's ruling that a dragon could attack by breathing fire while remaining invisible, I would accept it for what it is, a ruling.&nbsp; Some people believe the word &quot;attack&quot; has a game specific definition (similar to &quot;hit points&quot; or &quot;illusion&quot;).&nbsp; In that case an invisible dragon can breath fire all day.I believe we have game specific rules on how to resolve melee, ranged and spell attacks.&nbsp; Rules on how to implement certain types of attacks does not conflict nor replace the basic definition of an attack as a hostile action intended to do harm.&nbsp; I'm still attacking whether I'm trying to lop your head off with a sword or throwing a grenade.The problem I have with threads like this is that we can't just explain our positions, agree to disagree and move on.&nbsp; A ruling is not a house rule, it is simply an opinion on how to best interpret the rules.*Which is not to say that anyone posting to this thread, especially yours truly, is reasonable.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Oofta, post: 7354291, member: 6801845"] Reasonable people can, and do disagree all the time*. While I would disagree with someone's ruling that a dragon could attack by breathing fire while remaining invisible, I would accept it for what it is, a ruling. Some people believe the word "attack" has a game specific definition (similar to "hit points" or "illusion"). In that case an invisible dragon can breath fire all day. I believe we have game specific rules on how to resolve melee, ranged and spell attacks. Rules on how to implement certain types of attacks does not conflict nor replace the basic definition of an attack as a hostile action intended to do harm. I'm still attacking whether I'm trying to lop your head off with a sword or throwing a grenade. The problem I have with threads like this is that we can't just explain our positions, agree to disagree and move on. A ruling is not a house rule, it is simply an opinion on how to best interpret the rules. [I]*Which is not to say that anyone posting to this thread, especially yours truly, is reasonable.[/I] [/QUOTE]

Verification