Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Arial Black" data-source="post: 7355829" data-attributes="member: 6799649">We have to balance a tiny quibble about 1-3 words to make it even more clear versus an absolute certainty that if he wanted dragon breath and other non-attack, non-spell casting actions to pop invisibility then he would not answer the question by stating that 'attack' means 'attack roll' or 'explicit statement'.In order to make his statement match the strict interpretation even you only need to add 1-3 words (because it works as is for me), but to make the statement match the looser interpretation of 'any offensive action pops invisibility' you would have to change the entire statement!The two interpretations of his statement simply do not carry the same weight.</blockquote>