Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Son of the Serpent" data-source="post: 7869891" data-attributes="member: 7015476">1.&nbsp; Its not passive.&nbsp; Developers have stated plainly that its a concerted effort.&nbsp; That they do actually shoehorn things in whether it makes optimal sense or not.&nbsp; So if you are an honest individual (of course you may jist not have realized.&nbsp; Thats fine too.) you already know that this trend being a passive one is off the table.&nbsp; The developers have specified otherwise.&nbsp; On this site as well as many other venues.2.&nbsp; Lets just entertain the hypothetical you introduced because im curious.&nbsp; What if the answer is &quot;yes&quot;?&nbsp; What then do you propose?&nbsp; Surely you understand that if the answer is &quot;yes&quot; that means the message is being pushed harder than what would recieve optimal results right?&nbsp; Would that not mean that if the true objective is progress a scale back is in order?&nbsp; Because that is how one would pursue optimal behavioral adjustment.&nbsp; Otherwise all you acheive is being annoying and probably a major fall back when people get &quot;fatigued&quot; enough after an implicit &quot;suck it up&quot; is issued too many times to too many people.&nbsp; Not good marketing.&nbsp; Might wanna avoid that.&nbsp; For optimal results.&nbsp; But anyway, as i was saying, if the answer really is &quot;yes&quot;, what then?&nbsp; How do you proceed?&nbsp; Pretty interesting hypothetical.Ps.&nbsp; Nearly everyone ignores pronoun alterations in anonymous surveys at this point.&nbsp; Might be a sign of what he's talking about happening.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Son of the Serpent, post: 7869891, member: 7015476"] 1. Its not passive. Developers have stated plainly that its a concerted effort. That they do actually shoehorn things in whether it makes optimal sense or not. So if you are an [I]honest[/I] individual (of course you may jist not have realized. Thats fine too.) you already know that this trend being a passive one is off the table. The developers have specified otherwise. On this site as well as many other venues. 2. Lets just entertain the hypothetical you introduced because im curious. What if the answer is "yes"? What then do you propose? Surely you understand that if the answer is "yes" that means the message is being pushed harder than what would recieve optimal results right? Would that not mean that if the true objective is progress a scale back is in order? Because that is how one would pursue optimal behavioral adjustment. Otherwise all you acheive is being annoying and probably a major fall back when people get "fatigued" enough after an implicit "suck it up" is issued too many times to too many people. Not good marketing. Might wanna avoid that. For optimal results. But anyway, as i was saying, if the answer really is "yes", what then? How do you proceed? Pretty interesting hypothetical. Ps. Nearly everyone ignores pronoun alterations in anonymous surveys at this point. Might be a sign of what he's talking about happening. [/QUOTE]

Verification