Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Diversity in D&D Third Edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Urriak Uruk" data-source="post: 7870166" data-attributes="member: 7015558"><p>While you are in practice correct, you're missing <em>why </em>motive is important.</p><p></p><p>Darth Sidious can use as much fact and logic as possible to prove he is correct that dictatorship is the most peaceful and stable form of government. He may even be correct. But because his motive for why he is making that argument has nothing to do with the actual accuracy of his beliefs, his entire premise is thrown into doubt, and to a large degree invalidates his own argument.</p><p></p><p>It also, a step further, removes legitimacy from the people who legitimately have pure motives but agree with the selfish.</p><p></p><p>For example, lets say Grand Moff Tarkin legitimately believes that the Empire is the most stable form of government, and is just a "good old soldier" doing his best to preserve the peace through his own means; he does not take pleasure/pride in his actions, but is doing them because he truly believes the Empire is good and that rebellion is bad.</p><p></p><p>On paper, the Grand Moff has moral motives as he believes in his cause and has not selfish ulterior motive. But because his actions are not just propping up the Empire, but also protecting the Emperor (and by proxy, the Emperor's selfish motives), the Grand Moff is inadvertently supporting selfish and immoral people.</p><p></p><p>The same applies to those who agree with racists/sexists. People may agree with them on certain arguments; but by supporting their arguments, you are giving them legitimacy, legitimacy that they are using not to actualize the merits of the arguments, but instead to continue propagating their selfish immoral racist/sexist ways.</p><p></p><p>Essentially, in an ideal world we would like to divorce fact/logic from motive. But this is not possible, and you must ask yourself; does my argument, however good my intentions are, support the lifestyle and opinions of those you are selfish and immoral? If the answer is "yes," one must reevaluate the strength of that argument entirely.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Urriak Uruk, post: 7870166, member: 7015558"] While you are in practice correct, you're missing [I]why [/I]motive is important. Darth Sidious can use as much fact and logic as possible to prove he is correct that dictatorship is the most peaceful and stable form of government. He may even be correct. But because his motive for why he is making that argument has nothing to do with the actual accuracy of his beliefs, his entire premise is thrown into doubt, and to a large degree invalidates his own argument. It also, a step further, removes legitimacy from the people who legitimately have pure motives but agree with the selfish. For example, lets say Grand Moff Tarkin legitimately believes that the Empire is the most stable form of government, and is just a "good old soldier" doing his best to preserve the peace through his own means; he does not take pleasure/pride in his actions, but is doing them because he truly believes the Empire is good and that rebellion is bad. On paper, the Grand Moff has moral motives as he believes in his cause and has not selfish ulterior motive. But because his actions are not just propping up the Empire, but also protecting the Emperor (and by proxy, the Emperor's selfish motives), the Grand Moff is inadvertently supporting selfish and immoral people. The same applies to those who agree with racists/sexists. People may agree with them on certain arguments; but by supporting their arguments, you are giving them legitimacy, legitimacy that they are using not to actualize the merits of the arguments, but instead to continue propagating their selfish immoral racist/sexist ways. Essentially, in an ideal world we would like to divorce fact/logic from motive. But this is not possible, and you must ask yourself; does my argument, however good my intentions are, support the lifestyle and opinions of those you are selfish and immoral? If the answer is "yes," one must reevaluate the strength of that argument entirely. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Diversity in D&D Third Edition
Top