Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Diversity in D&D Third Edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Urriak Uruk" data-source="post: 7870463" data-attributes="member: 7015558"><p>I'm actually not really talking about the "ends justify the means," rather more how any argument made by bad people to justify bad behavior should inherently be considered untrustworthy.</p><p></p><p>Consider Ozymandias from Watchmen; he kills hundreds of thousands (maybe a couple million) in New York to save many more millions and the world from a possible nuclear war. This is the "ends justify the means," example.</p><p></p><p>But Ozymandias, even though his plan is pretty insane, actually does have good intentions, and as far as the book states does not have any ulterior motive beyond wanting to prevent a nuclear war (a fairly moral goal, done with fairly immoral means).</p><p></p><p>This is very different than what I am saying is so wrong about agreeing with a racist's goals. If you're supporting the opinions of people who are making them for their own selfish reasons, you're inadvertently supporting selfish immoral people, and their goals.</p><p></p><p>If Ozymandias was secretly a raging psychopath that wanted to destroy New York not because it would prevent nuclear war, but because <em>he would enjoy it</em>, how we view Ozymandias inherently changes. It would also make keeping Ozymandias' actions secret (which all the people who know of his plan save Rorsarch do) much harder to feel comfortable doing, as you're allowing a very immoral act made for selfish reasons to go unpunished. It would in effect make Rorsarch POV (to expose Ozymandias) the <em>moral </em>thing to do. To do otherwise would allow a psychopath to go free, and perhaps continue to kill (as the massacre would have happened regardless of the nuclear war justification). Whether or not it prevents nuclear war is unimportant in such a circumstance.</p><p></p><p>It's why Ozymandias actions are at least justifiable, but the Comedian's actions (rape, murder, war) almost entirely immoral; the intent behind them is what makes them viewed differently, even though the outcome is ultimately similar. It's one of the reasons the Comedian is so terrified of Ozymandias' plan; that he'll not only outdo him in devastation, but do it for the right reasons.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Urriak Uruk, post: 7870463, member: 7015558"] I'm actually not really talking about the "ends justify the means," rather more how any argument made by bad people to justify bad behavior should inherently be considered untrustworthy. Consider Ozymandias from Watchmen; he kills hundreds of thousands (maybe a couple million) in New York to save many more millions and the world from a possible nuclear war. This is the "ends justify the means," example. But Ozymandias, even though his plan is pretty insane, actually does have good intentions, and as far as the book states does not have any ulterior motive beyond wanting to prevent a nuclear war (a fairly moral goal, done with fairly immoral means). This is very different than what I am saying is so wrong about agreeing with a racist's goals. If you're supporting the opinions of people who are making them for their own selfish reasons, you're inadvertently supporting selfish immoral people, and their goals. If Ozymandias was secretly a raging psychopath that wanted to destroy New York not because it would prevent nuclear war, but because [I]he would enjoy it[/I], how we view Ozymandias inherently changes. It would also make keeping Ozymandias' actions secret (which all the people who know of his plan save Rorsarch do) much harder to feel comfortable doing, as you're allowing a very immoral act made for selfish reasons to go unpunished. It would in effect make Rorsarch POV (to expose Ozymandias) the [I]moral [/I]thing to do. To do otherwise would allow a psychopath to go free, and perhaps continue to kill (as the massacre would have happened regardless of the nuclear war justification). Whether or not it prevents nuclear war is unimportant in such a circumstance. It's why Ozymandias actions are at least justifiable, but the Comedian's actions (rape, murder, war) almost entirely immoral; the intent behind them is what makes them viewed differently, even though the outcome is ultimately similar. It's one of the reasons the Comedian is so terrified of Ozymandias' plan; that he'll not only outdo him in devastation, but do it for the right reasons. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Diversity in D&D Third Edition
Top