Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DracoSuave" data-source="post: 4974428" data-attributes="member: 71571">The problem only exists for creatures that can lay down a mark for a duration other than a turn.  That's Divine Challenge (easily circumvented) and this -one- monster.  Oh and a single Fighter power, maybe.I just don't see the need to go all errata on this.  One is circumvented by a shift of one square... is an errata -really- necessary just to cover -one- single monster?That's not much of a problem.  Very few PC marks have any sort of persistant duration.  I have no problem with a mark lasting while the PC is dying.  If you're that low on hps to begin with, maybe marking is a -bad tactical decision- and this is one of the reasons why.  If there's a need for errata, it's for what effects do and don't go away when you die.  That's a problem with -death- not with the marking rules.Again, the problem is the rules for character -death- and how it applies to effects in general, not to marks themselves.  Let's focus on the -real- issue here.-If- there is errata necessary, it is -not- for the marked condition.  As indicated above, the problem is in how death effects effects in general.  -That- is where the rules break down.Other than that tho, marking works -just fine- and thusly, errata are a waste of resources.EDIT:  Not having my books handy, isn't there something that says your effects end if you die?  If that's the case, well, then marking is certainly covered as well.  I know I use that as a houserule, with the exception of save ending conditions.</blockquote>

Verification