Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Divine Challenge/Sanction with Invis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="babinro" data-source="post: 4877035" data-attributes="member: 67482"><p>My friends stumbled upon this fun combo and I was just wanting to make sure that its actually legal. I've allowed it so far and can't see anything specifically wrong with it except that it comes across as a little bit cheesy (in a fun way).</p><p></p><p>My players Paladin uses level 1 Encounter Valorous Smite, which places a divine sanction on all enemies within 3 squares upon hitting. He'll also use divine challenge on the primary target he attacked. Assuming the initiative count works out fine, the druid will use his Camouflage Cloak (level 6 utility) to make the Paladin invisible. </p><p></p><p>When it comes around to the creatures turn, they will typically avoid the invisible paladin (barring things like tremor sense) and take a significant amount of damage as he has been maximizing it with feats.</p><p></p><p>Also, hypothetically, if the creature were to attack the square in which they believe the Paladin to be in, would they take challenge damage if they guessed the wrong square? Or does that qualify as trying to attack the Pally?</p><p></p><p>Is there anything wrong with this? Or is just the PC's working together in a cool way to maximize the Paladin's potential.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="babinro, post: 4877035, member: 67482"] My friends stumbled upon this fun combo and I was just wanting to make sure that its actually legal. I've allowed it so far and can't see anything specifically wrong with it except that it comes across as a little bit cheesy (in a fun way). My players Paladin uses level 1 Encounter Valorous Smite, which places a divine sanction on all enemies within 3 squares upon hitting. He'll also use divine challenge on the primary target he attacked. Assuming the initiative count works out fine, the druid will use his Camouflage Cloak (level 6 utility) to make the Paladin invisible. When it comes around to the creatures turn, they will typically avoid the invisible paladin (barring things like tremor sense) and take a significant amount of damage as he has been maximizing it with feats. Also, hypothetically, if the creature were to attack the square in which they believe the Paladin to be in, would they take challenge damage if they guessed the wrong square? Or does that qualify as trying to attack the Pally? Is there anything wrong with this? Or is just the PC's working together in a cool way to maximize the Paladin's potential. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Divine Challenge/Sanction with Invis
Top