Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 5835276" data-attributes="member: 1465">That's actually what I meant: evil was behind the injustice that fell upon them. Of course there's no way I can tell whether the OP's case had some evil scheme behind, but IMHO there'd better be.When I am a player I like having to confront the shades of gray. But I had players that I knew could not easily tolerate the feeling of being "framed from murder" unless I gave them clue that evil was behind it, which implies that the story will be about uncovering it and restore justice. Making the story so that really an injustice happens is different. See that I said he shouldn't have done it because of what in fact it brought to his table... If we had written a post like yours, where everybody had fun with the scenario, I would have written that he did a great job. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />In the general case my suggestion is to try sensitive scenarios only if you're fairly sure the group will accept them, and avoid them otherwise if you don't know the group enough. It's nothing more than a safe precaution, really.</blockquote>