Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Thomas Shey" data-source="post: 8167804" data-attributes="member: 7026617">Regarding your second point, because in the cases involved there, all the players involved were strong enough personalities it wasn't a concern (again, remember I haven't done this with all groups as I've noted repeatedly).Regarding your first, you're making an assumption this happened all the time.  Most of the time it was either clear enough from the rules involved or no one cared enough to disagree in the first place.(This is another one of those things; just because a group reserves the right to make a group decision on something doesn't mean they need to do it all the time.  You can still have a default decision-maker and have it only come up when there's a conflict).</blockquote>